Paraphilia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) more information about pro-paraphilia MAPs. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Paraphilia''' is a poorly-defined term applied to nonstandard sexual interests, including [[pedophilia]]. It has been a category of mental disorder in the [[DSM]] since DSM-III; previous editions used the more openly prejudicial if synonymous label "sexual deviation."<ref>[http://www.psychiatryonline.com/DSMPDF/dsm-ii.pdf DSM-II]</ref> The DSM-IV, for example, defined paraphilias as featuring "recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors generally involving 1) nonhuman objects, 2) the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner, or 3) children or other nonconsenting persons that occur over a period of at least 6 months." [[John Money]], who popularized the term, told [[Paidika]] in 1991 that "paraphilia" has no connotation of pathology.<ref>Geraci, Joseph and Mader, Donald (1991). "Interview: John Money," ''Paidika'', [http://exitinterview.biz/rarities/paidika/n7/paidika7.pdf 7], p. 4.</ref> A minority of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] have embraced the term, some in an attempt to reclaim it, and some owing to their [[anti-contact]] beliefs. They point to the fact that since 2013, according to the [[DSM]], to qualify as a psychiatric disorder, a "paraphilia" must be accompanied by negative factors such as distress.<ref>[https://map-wiki.com/index.php/Paraphilia MAP Wiki's (anti-c) article on Paraphilia]</ref> | '''Paraphilia''' is a poorly-defined term applied to nonstandard sexual interests, including [[pedophilia]]. It has been a category of mental disorder in the [[DSM]] since DSM-III; previous editions used the more openly prejudicial if synonymous label "sexual deviation."<ref>[http://www.psychiatryonline.com/DSMPDF/dsm-ii.pdf DSM-II]</ref> The DSM-IV, for example, defined paraphilias as featuring "recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors generally involving 1) nonhuman objects, 2) the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner, or 3) children or other nonconsenting persons that occur over a period of at least 6 months." [[John Money]], who popularized the term, told [[Paidika]] in 1991 that "paraphilia" has no connotation of pathology.<ref>Geraci, Joseph and Mader, Donald (1991). "Interview: John Money," ''Paidika'', [http://exitinterview.biz/rarities/paidika/n7/paidika7.pdf 7], p. 4.</ref> A minority of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] have embraced the term, some in an attempt to reclaim it, and some owing to their [[anti-contact]] beliefs. They point to the fact that since 2013, according to the [[DSM]], to qualify as a psychiatric disorder, a "paraphilia" must be accompanied by negative factors such as distress.<ref>[https://map-wiki.com/index.php/Paraphilia MAP Wiki's (anti-c) article on Paraphilia]</ref> Some "pro-para" personas also describe themselves as "pro-recovery", which may mean reorientation, or otherwise recovery from the distress caused by the "disorder" of pedophilia. | ||
[[Gisela Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg]] views paraphilias -- having "forbidden" or "atypical" thoughts -- as a resurrection of the 18th and 19th century concept of moral insanity.<ref>Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg, Gisela (1988). "The Paedophile Impulse: Toward the Development of an Etiology of Child-Adult Sexual Contacts from an Ethological and Ethnological Viewpoint," ''Paidika'', [http://exitinterview.biz/rarities/paidika/n3/paidika3.pdf 3], p. 36.</ref> [[Charles Moser]] has argued vigorously for the removal of all paraphilias from the DSM. The construct of paraphilia is a "pseudoscientific attempt to regulate sexuality," according to Moser.<ref>Moser, C. (2001). "[http://tempik.webzdarma.cz/literatura/parmoser/ Paraphilia: A Critique of a Confused Concept]," in P. J. Kleinplatz (ed.), ''New Directions in Sex Therapy: Innovations and Alternatives'', pp. 91-108.</ref><ref>Moser, C. & Kleinplatz, P.J. (2005). "[http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GESUND/ARCHIV/MoserKleinplatz.htm DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An argument for removal]," ''Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality'', 17(3/4), pp. 91-109.</ref> [[Frederick Suppe]] has similarly argued that the DSM's classification of paraphilias is without empirical grounding and "merely the codification of social mores."<ref>Suppe, F. (1984). "Classifying sexual disorders: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association," ''Journal of Homosexuality'', 9(4), 9–28.</ref> | [[Gisela Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg]] views paraphilias -- having "forbidden" or "atypical" thoughts -- as a resurrection of the 18th and 19th century concept of moral insanity.<ref>Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg, Gisela (1988). "The Paedophile Impulse: Toward the Development of an Etiology of Child-Adult Sexual Contacts from an Ethological and Ethnological Viewpoint," ''Paidika'', [http://exitinterview.biz/rarities/paidika/n3/paidika3.pdf 3], p. 36.</ref> [[Charles Moser]] has argued vigorously for the removal of all paraphilias from the DSM. The construct of paraphilia is a "pseudoscientific attempt to regulate sexuality," according to Moser.<ref>Moser, C. (2001). "[http://tempik.webzdarma.cz/literatura/parmoser/ Paraphilia: A Critique of a Confused Concept]," in P. J. Kleinplatz (ed.), ''New Directions in Sex Therapy: Innovations and Alternatives'', pp. 91-108.</ref><ref>Moser, C. & Kleinplatz, P.J. (2005). "[http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GESUND/ARCHIV/MoserKleinplatz.htm DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An argument for removal]," ''Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality'', 17(3/4), pp. 91-109.</ref> [[Frederick Suppe]] has similarly argued that the DSM's classification of paraphilias is without empirical grounding and "merely the codification of social mores."<ref>Suppe, F. (1984). "Classifying sexual disorders: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association," ''Journal of Homosexuality'', 9(4), 9–28.</ref> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[[Wikipedia:List of paraphilias|List of paraphilias]] - Wikipedia listicle that claims up to 547 "paraphilic sexual interests" can be identified, and attempts to [[reification|reify]] many. | *[[Wikipedia:List of paraphilias|List of paraphilias]] - Wikipedia listicle that claims up to 547 "paraphilic sexual interests" can be identified, and attempts to [[reification|reify]] many. [https://map-wiki.com/index.php/List_of_paraphilias MAP Wiki], who endorse the "paraphilia" label are refining the list. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 13:16, 18 July 2022
Paraphilia is a poorly-defined term applied to nonstandard sexual interests, including pedophilia. It has been a category of mental disorder in the DSM since DSM-III; previous editions used the more openly prejudicial if synonymous label "sexual deviation."[1] The DSM-IV, for example, defined paraphilias as featuring "recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors generally involving 1) nonhuman objects, 2) the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner, or 3) children or other nonconsenting persons that occur over a period of at least 6 months." John Money, who popularized the term, told Paidika in 1991 that "paraphilia" has no connotation of pathology.[2] A minority of MAPs have embraced the term, some in an attempt to reclaim it, and some owing to their anti-contact beliefs. They point to the fact that since 2013, according to the DSM, to qualify as a psychiatric disorder, a "paraphilia" must be accompanied by negative factors such as distress.[3] Some "pro-para" personas also describe themselves as "pro-recovery", which may mean reorientation, or otherwise recovery from the distress caused by the "disorder" of pedophilia.
Gisela Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg views paraphilias -- having "forbidden" or "atypical" thoughts -- as a resurrection of the 18th and 19th century concept of moral insanity.[4] Charles Moser has argued vigorously for the removal of all paraphilias from the DSM. The construct of paraphilia is a "pseudoscientific attempt to regulate sexuality," according to Moser.[5][6] Frederick Suppe has similarly argued that the DSM's classification of paraphilias is without empirical grounding and "merely the codification of social mores."[7]
See also
External links
- List of paraphilias - Wikipedia listicle that claims up to 547 "paraphilic sexual interests" can be identified, and attempts to reify many. MAP Wiki, who endorse the "paraphilia" label are refining the list.
References
- ↑ DSM-II
- ↑ Geraci, Joseph and Mader, Donald (1991). "Interview: John Money," Paidika, 7, p. 4.
- ↑ MAP Wiki's (anti-c) article on Paraphilia
- ↑ Blelbtreu-Ehrenberg, Gisela (1988). "The Paedophile Impulse: Toward the Development of an Etiology of Child-Adult Sexual Contacts from an Ethological and Ethnological Viewpoint," Paidika, 3, p. 36.
- ↑ Moser, C. (2001). "Paraphilia: A Critique of a Confused Concept," in P. J. Kleinplatz (ed.), New Directions in Sex Therapy: Innovations and Alternatives, pp. 91-108.
- ↑ Moser, C. & Kleinplatz, P.J. (2005). "DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An argument for removal," Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 17(3/4), pp. 91-109.
- ↑ Suppe, F. (1984). "Classifying sexual disorders: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association," Journal of Homosexuality, 9(4), 9–28.