Safeguarding: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
The term has become particularly common in the [[UK]], where it is used by local authorities to legitimize a range of protective measures, a number of which might come under increased [[Special Article: Adverse effects of hysteria|scrutiny]] if assessed on their individual merits. The term is part of an [[List of obfuscatory terms used by authorities|array of obfuscatory terms]] used by governments to legitimize powers they have over the running of everyday life.
The term has become particularly common in the [[UK]], where it is used by local authorities to legitimize a range of protective measures, a number of which might come under increased [[Special Article: Adverse effects of hysteria|scrutiny]] if assessed on their individual merits. The term is part of an [[List of obfuscatory terms used by authorities|array of obfuscatory terms]] used by governments to legitimize powers they have over the running of everyday life.


==Linkage to conservative feminism==
==Linkage to conservative feminism, abuse for political ends==


More recently, the term has been explicitly adopted by radical (conservative) [[Feminism|feminists]], much like [[grooming]]. One prime example is the British ''Safe Schools Alliance'', a front-group that adopts the optics of a charity to push a radical anti-trans agenda.<ref>[https://safeschoolsallianceuk.net/frequently-asked-questions/ Safe Schools Alliance FAQ]</ref> Examples of this can be seen throughout social media, whenever education-adjacent British feminists are mobilized by controversies centering on the normalization of attraction to minors.
More recently, the term has been explicitly adopted by radical (conservative) [[Feminism|feminists]], much like [[grooming]]. One prime example is the British ''Safe Schools Alliance'', a front-group that adopts the optics of a charity to push a radical anti-trans agenda.<ref>[https://safeschoolsallianceuk.net/frequently-asked-questions/ Safe Schools Alliance FAQ]</ref> Examples of this abuse for political ends can be seen throughout social media, whenever education-adjacent British feminists are mobilized by controversies centering on the normalization of attraction to minors, such as in the case of [[Jacob Breslow]].


==Linkage to racism==
==Linkage to racism==

Revision as of 17:06, 9 October 2022

Safeguarding is the practice by authorities and communities of "protecting the interests" of children and others who they judge to be "vulnerable". It can therefore be seen as an ongoing "protective" influence on behalf of children, without their input or consent.

The term has become particularly common in the UK, where it is used by local authorities to legitimize a range of protective measures, a number of which might come under increased scrutiny if assessed on their individual merits. The term is part of an array of obfuscatory terms used by governments to legitimize powers they have over the running of everyday life.

Linkage to conservative feminism, abuse for political ends

More recently, the term has been explicitly adopted by radical (conservative) feminists, much like grooming. One prime example is the British Safe Schools Alliance, a front-group that adopts the optics of a charity to push a radical anti-trans agenda.[1] Examples of this abuse for political ends can be seen throughout social media, whenever education-adjacent British feminists are mobilized by controversies centering on the normalization of attraction to minors, such as in the case of Jacob Breslow.

Linkage to racism

It has been suggested, particularly by left-wing writers, that the idea of "safeguarding or rescuing children" both perpetuates and institutionalizes a racist belief system that paints ethnic minorities outside the western world as passive victims, but as culpable "delinquents" within said democracies. This is said to be achieved by way of selective application.

References