23 Sep, 2024: Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior against MAPs, on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group, is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of disinformation by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.

Talk:Prince Andrew: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "==Good== I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Good==
==Good==


I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this.
I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:08, 25 May 2023

Good

I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. --The Admins (talk) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)