Debate Guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality|Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality]] | *[[Debate Guide: Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality|Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality]] | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Respond to Misdefinition|Respond to Misdefinition]] and [[Debate Guide: Myths]]. | *[[Debate Guide: Respond to Misdefinition|Respond to Misdefinition]] and [[Debate Guide: Myths|Myths]]. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Respond to Rhetoric|Respond to Rhetoric]] | *[[Debate Guide: Respond to Rhetoric|Respond to Rhetoric]] | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Social Constructionism|Social Constructionism]] | *[[Debate Guide: Social Constructionism|Social Constructionism]] | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 31 October 2008
- You are viewing an incomplete version of Debate Guide. For a fuller version, see here.
- Feedback Forum available
Debate Guide is a growing list of arguments and counter arguments for the sexual emancipation of minors and minor attracted adults.
It also functions as centre for advice, links and external debate resources pertaining to these issues and the age of consent.
Introduction
Introduction to Debate Guide
General Advisory
Starting a Debate
Responding to Arguments
- Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality
- Respond to Misdefinition and Myths.
- Respond to Rhetoric
- Social Constructionism
- Other trends worth considering
Arguments: Assertive and Defensive
"Minor" Arguments
- Evolutionary Logic - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
- Reverse Sexualisation - Acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
- Liberty-Empowerment - Empower young people with the freedom to learn.
- Cyclical Paternalism - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
- Prior Experience - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
- Against: Cognitive Ability - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
- Against: Online Dangers - Argues against the idea of the internet being a dangerous place for minors.
- Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
"Adult" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
"Minor-Attraction" Arguments
- Against: Pedophiles chose their condition
- Against: Pedophilia is unnatural
Peripheral Arguments
- Child Abuse Industry
- The Professional Victim
- The nature of Human Attraction - Why humans have a capacity for diverse taste.
- The Hypocritical Establishment - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous.
- Sexual Repression as a tool of the State
- Historical Nonadult-Adult sex
- Adverse effects of hysteria
- Self-Loathing Hatred
- Parenthood and Pedophilia
- Abuse of Language
- Problems with the Age of Consent
- SOR Problems - Argues against the Sex Offenders' Register
- Against: All Good Parents Would Know - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgements.
Debate Resources
Research
A collection of scientific research and other demonstrative references on matters relevant to minor sexuality.
Links (Debate Guide)
Links that have some relevance to debating the issues contained within the guide.
Links (Fora)
Applicable forums and some examples of debates on the issues covered.
About the Guide
What's new?
- Also see Recent Changes
Feedback
History and Credits (Debate Guide)
Newgon.com: Useful Stuff
Not Pleased?
Contribute! From the simplest of corrections to the most complex of new arguments, we want to hear from you. Just drop by the Blog or Forum, or e-mail an administrator. You could even be given membership to edit this wiki!