Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about adult-minor relationships: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''People fail to appreciate the flaws of Age of Consent laws...'''
'''Age of Consent laws are a blunt instrument...'''


*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: It's wrong because it's illegal|It's wrong because it's illegal]] - Homosexuality was once illegal.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: It's wrong because it's illegal|It's wrong because it's illegal]] - Homosexuality was once illegal.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: There is no law that prohibits minors|There is no law that prohibits minors]] - Nonsensical argument claiming minors are already sexually emancipated.
*[[Debate Guide: Problems with the Age of Consent|Problems with the Age of Consent]] - There are numerous flaws, listed on this page.
*[[Debate Guide: Problems with the Age of Consent|Problems with the Age of Consent]] - There are numerous flaws, listed on this page.
:*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Legal pragmatism|Legal pragmatism]] - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".
:*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Legal pragmatism|Legal pragmatism]] - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: There is no law that prohibits minors|There is no law that prohibits minors]] - Nonsensical argument claiming minors are already sexually emancipated.


'''Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...'''
'''Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...'''
Line 10: Line 10:
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: All child molesters are pedophiles|All child molesters are pedophiles]] - This belief is demonstrably false.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: All child molesters are pedophiles|All child molesters are pedophiles]] - This belief is demonstrably false.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: "Stranger danger" or "It could be anyone"|"Stranger danger" or "It could be anyone"]] - Two conflicting "expert" opinions (both unfounded, abused to incite fear).
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: "Stranger danger" or "It could be anyone"|"Stranger danger" or "It could be anyone"]] - Two conflicting "expert" opinions (both unfounded, abused to incite fear).
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - Experience is not a necessity. We all start inexperienced.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|If we could only save one child]] - Negative utilitarianism is discredited and nonsensical meta-ethics.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|If we could only save one child]] - Negative utilitarianism is discredited and nonsensical meta-ethics.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Child sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming .
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming .
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - When is supposedly the "best time" to gain life experience?


'''Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...'''
'''Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...'''
Line 18: Line 18:
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Power disparity|Power disparity/Stockholm Syndrome]] - Differences in power are not automatically inductive to abuse.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Power disparity|Power disparity/Stockholm Syndrome]] - Differences in power are not automatically inductive to abuse.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Profound and lifelong scarring|Profound and lifelong scarring]] - These characteristics are atypical and not intrinsic.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Profound and lifelong scarring|Profound and lifelong scarring]] - These characteristics are atypical and not intrinsic.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Doomed from the beginning|Doomed from the beginning]] - Will adult-minor relationships really die off as the youngster grows older?
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Recidivism is highest among child sex offenders|Recidivism is highest among child sex offenders]] - Demonstrably false.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Recidivism is highest among child sex offenders|Recidivism is highest among child sex offenders]] - Demonstrably false.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Doomed from the beginning|Doomed from the beginning]] - Will adult-minor relationships really die off as the youngster grows older?


'''Other societies and species are points of interest...'''
'''Other societies and species are points of interest...'''


*[[Debate Guide: Nonhuman relatives|Nonhuman relatives]] - Other species' adult-juvenile sexuality.
*[[Debate Guide: Nonhuman relatives|Nonhuman relatives]] - Other species' adult-juvenile sexuality.
*[[Debate Guide: Historical nonadult-adult sex|Historical nonadult-adult sex]] - Historical precedent for adult-minor sexual emacipation.
*[[Debate Guide: Historical nonadult-adult sex|Historical nonadult-adult sex]] - Historical precedent for adult-minor sexual emancipation.


'''Many people also speak from direct experience...'''
'''Many people also speak from direct experience...'''


*[[Accounts and Testimonies|Our database of accounts]] - An anecdotal study, including useful infographics.
*[[Accounts and Testimonies|Our database of accounts]] - An anecdotal study, including useful infographics.

Latest revision as of 00:34, 13 April 2024

Age of Consent laws are a blunt instrument...

  • Against: Legal pragmatism - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".

Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...

Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...

Other societies and species are points of interest...

Many people also speak from direct experience...