Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about adult-minor relationships: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Jim Burton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - When is supposedly the "best time" to gain life experience?
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - When is supposedly the "best time" to gain life experience?
*''Against'': [[Debate Guide:Teacher-Student Sex|Teacher/student sex]] - The contention these relations are always ethically wrong.


[[File:Gnhgdfsgrfrs.png|150px|link=|frameless|right]]
[[File:Gnhgdfsgrfrs.png|150px|link=|frameless|right]]

Latest revision as of 15:50, 13 April 2025

Age of Consent laws are a blunt instrument...

  • Against: Legal pragmatism - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".

Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...

Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...

Other societies and species are points of interest...

Many people also speak from direct experience...