Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of false claims by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.
Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction: Difference between revisions
New page: Whatever your age, it is generally seen as acceptable to 'fancy' an age peer - that is to express romantic or sexual love for children as a child, and possibly even to act on it in some mi... |
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Whatever your age, it is generally seen as acceptable to 'fancy' an age peer - that is to express romantic or sexual love for children as a child, and possibly even to act on it in some mild manner. But is it really true that your peak age of attraction should rise slowly, in line with your own age? Is it possible for the structure of the brain to change so much, as to go from expressing pedophilic traits, to not only a state of preferring adults, but showing no sexual or romantic attraction towards children at all? If not, as I predict, could it be that so many of us are in denial? Combine this supposed 'correspondence' theory with the findings of scientists investigating the attraction of females to adult and infant faces ([http:// | Whatever your age, it is generally seen as acceptable to 'fancy' an age peer - that is to express romantic or sexual love for children as a child, and possibly even to act on it in some mild manner. But is it really true that your peak age of attraction should rise slowly, in line with your own age? Is it possible for the structure of the brain to change so much, as to go from expressing pedophilic traits, to not only a state of preferring adults, but showing no sexual or romantic attraction towards children at all? If not, as I predict, could it be that so many of us are in denial? Combine this supposed 'correspondence' theory with the findings of scientists investigating the attraction of females to adult and infant faces ([http://debateguide.nfshost.com/Menarche%20and%20Interest%20in%20Infants.pdf study], [http://www.apa.org/science/psa/sb-maestripieri.html follow up]) before and after menarche, and it becomes even more futile. | ||
[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]] | [[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]] | ||
Revision as of 02:43, 7 February 2009
Whatever your age, it is generally seen as acceptable to 'fancy' an age peer - that is to express romantic or sexual love for children as a child, and possibly even to act on it in some mild manner. But is it really true that your peak age of attraction should rise slowly, in line with your own age? Is it possible for the structure of the brain to change so much, as to go from expressing pedophilic traits, to not only a state of preferring adults, but showing no sexual or romantic attraction towards children at all? If not, as I predict, could it be that so many of us are in denial? Combine this supposed 'correspondence' theory with the findings of scientists investigating the attraction of females to adult and infant faces (study, follow up) before and after menarche, and it becomes even more futile.