One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Talk:Flag proposal 2009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) New page: ==High res== I just noticed - we need a larger, high res image of at least one version of each concept for the main showcase. I saw that some of the images had lost their texture in the p... |
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I just noticed - we need a larger, high res image of at least one version of each concept for the main showcase. I saw that some of the images had lost their texture in the process of conversion, which is fine for the extended gallery. [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 16:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | I just noticed - we need a larger, high res image of at least one version of each concept for the main showcase. I saw that some of the images had lost their texture in the process of conversion, which is fine for the extended gallery. [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 16:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe we also need more than one high-res image for some concepts? [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 17:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:03, 26 February 2009
High res
I just noticed - we need a larger, high res image of at least one version of each concept for the main showcase. I saw that some of the images had lost their texture in the process of conversion, which is fine for the extended gallery. The Admins 16:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we also need more than one high-res image for some concepts? The Admins 17:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)