Talk:Flag proposal 2009: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
When I originally proposed the Multiflag, it was simply a possible 3d representation of the AmaroSymbol, rather than having to create a background color for the flag. Thus, I don't really see how it is a separate proposal from the AmaroSymbol. [[User:IsmAvatar|IsmAvatar]] 06:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | When I originally proposed the Multiflag, it was simply a possible 3d representation of the AmaroSymbol, rather than having to create a background color for the flag. Thus, I don't really see how it is a separate proposal from the AmaroSymbol. [[User:IsmAvatar|IsmAvatar]] 06:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Amaro Adults== | |||
I've removed part of the con for the AmaroSymbol and Multiflag which read "and may be seen as restricting discourse to said groups - almost entirely composed of adults". I do not see how a flag can restrict discourse, nor the relevance of the comment. Perhaps I misunderstood the comment, in which case it should be clarified. Furthermore, I'm tempted to remove the Con bullet point altogether because I do not see how it only applies to existing groups. Last I checked, there's only 2 genders in the world: Male and Female (ignoring the inbetween stages, as they don't techincally classify as a third gender), and we are trying to encourage free love. If you are trying to say that the Free Love concept is too restrictive, then you might as well say it for almost all of the flags. [[User:IsmAvatar|IsmAvatar]] 00:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:40, 13 March 2009
High res
I just noticed - we need a larger, high res image of at least one version of each concept for the main showcase. I saw that some of the images had lost their texture in the process of conversion, which is fine for the extended gallery. The Admins 16:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we also need more than one high-res image for some concepts? The Admins 17:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Admin is happy to pay for high res images without them being blown up from low-quality alternatives. Here is IsmAvatar's list of original proposals: http://www.ismavatar.com/flag/ The Admins 21:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Multiflag
When I originally proposed the Multiflag, it was simply a possible 3d representation of the AmaroSymbol, rather than having to create a background color for the flag. Thus, I don't really see how it is a separate proposal from the AmaroSymbol. IsmAvatar 06:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Amaro Adults
I've removed part of the con for the AmaroSymbol and Multiflag which read "and may be seen as restricting discourse to said groups - almost entirely composed of adults". I do not see how a flag can restrict discourse, nor the relevance of the comment. Perhaps I misunderstood the comment, in which case it should be clarified. Furthermore, I'm tempted to remove the Con bullet point altogether because I do not see how it only applies to existing groups. Last I checked, there's only 2 genders in the world: Male and Female (ignoring the inbetween stages, as they don't techincally classify as a third gender), and we are trying to encourage free love. If you are trying to say that the Free Love concept is too restrictive, then you might as well say it for almost all of the flags. IsmAvatar 00:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)