Debate Guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*[[Evolutionary Logic]] | *[[Evolutionary Logic]] | ||
*'''Against:''' [[ | *'''Against:''' [[Cognitive Ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached. | ||
==="Adult" Arguments=== | ==="Adult" Arguments=== | ||
Revision as of 23:18, 11 May 2008
Debate Guide is a growing list of arguments and counter arguments for the sexual emancipation of minors and minor attracted adults.
It also functions as centre for advice, links and external debate resources pertaining to these issues and the age of consent.
Introduction
Introduction to Debate Guide
General Advisory
Starting a Debate
Responding to Arguments
Arguments: Assertive and Defensive
"Minor" Arguments
- Against: Cognitive Ability - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
"Adult" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
"Minor-Attraction" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
Peripheral Arguments
This includes constructions of the biological.
- The Professional Victim
- The nature of Human Attraction - Why humans have a capacity for diverse taste.
- Historical Nonadult-Adult sex
- Self-Loathing Hatred
- Parenthood and Pedophilia
- Against: All Good Parents Would Know - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgements.
Debate Resources
Research
A collection of scientific research and other demonstrative references on matters relevant to minor sexuality.
Links (Debate Guide)
Links that have some relevance to debating the issues contained within the guide.
Links (Fora)
Applicable forums and some examples of debates on the issues covered.
About the Guide
What's new?
- Also see Recent Changes