Negotiating stigma: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) remove nonexistent cat, add founding cats (research, pubs and docs) as important to cat tree structure |
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Negotiating stigma''' is a doctoral thesis | '''Negotiating stigma''' is a doctoral thesis by [[Terry Leahy]], based on nineteen semi-structured interviews with people who, while they were from eight to sixteen years old, were involved in voluntary intergenerational relationships with adults from seventeen to fifty years of age. The interviewees were between ten and more than fifty years old and of both sexes, as were their adult partners. All considered their relationships as positive experiences and were well aware of the fact that they transgressed against the prohibition against intergenerational sex. | ||
In this study [[Terry Leahy]] poses the question how they dealt with this transgression, minimizing it, in fact.<ref>[[Terry Leahy|Leahy, T.]], 1991. "Negotiating stigma: approaches to intergenerational sex", ISBN 1877051, Univ. New South Wales, Sydney 1991. No longer on-line, for a partial summary see [http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/negotiating_stigma.htm].</ref> | In this study [[Terry Leahy]] poses the question how they dealt with this transgression, minimizing it, in fact.<ref>[[Terry Leahy|Leahy, T.]], 1991. "Negotiating stigma: approaches to intergenerational sex", ISBN 1877051, Univ. New South Wales, Sydney 1991. No longer on-line, for a partial summary see [http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/negotiating_stigma.htm].</ref> | ||
Revision as of 02:54, 10 July 2009
Negotiating stigma is a doctoral thesis by Terry Leahy, based on nineteen semi-structured interviews with people who, while they were from eight to sixteen years old, were involved in voluntary intergenerational relationships with adults from seventeen to fifty years of age. The interviewees were between ten and more than fifty years old and of both sexes, as were their adult partners. All considered their relationships as positive experiences and were well aware of the fact that they transgressed against the prohibition against intergenerational sex.
In this study Terry Leahy poses the question how they dealt with this transgression, minimizing it, in fact.[1]