Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
JohnHolt (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Sex, children and minors are not incompatible...'''
'''People under the age of majority can be sexual...'''


*[[Debate Guide: Evolutionary logic|Evolutionary logic]] - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
*[[Debate Guide: Evolutionary logic|Evolutionary logic]] - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
Line 19: Line 19:
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction|Corresponding age attraction]] - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.


'''From the encyclopedia...'''
'''From the encyclopedia...'''

Revision as of 06:43, 14 October 2021

People under the age of majority can be sexual...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
  • Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
  • Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

From the encyclopedia...