One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Rind.jpg|Basic Rind Paradox infographic | |||
RindTrom2000CondemnationofaScientific.jpg|Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm | RindTrom2000CondemnationofaScientific.jpg|Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm | ||
File:Guardian.png|Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in ''The Guardian'' | File:Guardian.png|Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in ''The Guardian'' | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 25 November 2021
-
Basic Rind Paradox infographic
-
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm
-
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian
-
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm
-
Self-perception: Importance
-
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables
-
More secondary harms
-
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status
-
General reading on intrinsic harm
-
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm
-
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm
-
CSA harm was known to be confounded even before Rind
-
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"