Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Rind.jpg|Basic Rind Paradox infographic | |||
RindTrom2000CondemnationofaScientific.jpg|Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm | RindTrom2000CondemnationofaScientific.jpg|Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm | ||
File:Guardian.png|Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in ''The Guardian'' | File:Guardian.png|Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in ''The Guardian'' |
Revision as of 12:10, 25 November 2021
-
Basic Rind Paradox infographic
-
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm
-
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian
-
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm
-
Self-perception: Importance
-
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables
-
More secondary harms
-
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status
-
General reading on intrinsic harm
-
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm
-
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm
-
CSA harm was known to be confounded even before Rind
-
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"