Talk:Anti-contact: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
**They oppose age of consent reform."
**They oppose age of consent reform."


Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 19:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? --[[User:Time Has Passed|Time Has Passed]] ([[User talk:Time Has Passed|talk]]) 03:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 
:I presonally prefer anti reform vs pro choice/pro reform, but I think we have to reflect and develop on the present terminology. "Pro-contact" seems to have evolved into a way for NOMAPs to take out a loan on the public image of other MAPs. I know 15 years ago, it was used in a naive way, but that seems to have been weaponized.
 
:I will modify it slightly, see if it works. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 19:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 2 December 2021

Regarding:

  • Consequentialist anti-c (c-anti-c). In this instance, celibacy is called for in the present climate. Further, such an individual might maintain that:
    • They are not presently interested in age of consent reform. Supporters of very limited reforms sometimes also self-describe as anti-contact.
    • They oppose age of consent reform."

Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? --Time Has Passed (talk) 03:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

I presonally prefer anti reform vs pro choice/pro reform, but I think we have to reflect and develop on the present terminology. "Pro-contact" seems to have evolved into a way for NOMAPs to take out a loan on the public image of other MAPs. I know 15 years ago, it was used in a naive way, but that seems to have been weaponized.
I will modify it slightly, see if it works. --The Admins (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)