One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Kathryn Bond Stockton
Kathryn Bond Stockton is Distinguished Professor of English, former Associate Vice President for Equity and Diversity, and inaugural Dean of the School for Cultural & Social Transformation at the University of Utah, where she teaches queer theory, theories of race and racialized gender, and twentieth-century literature and film. Two of her books — Beautiful Bottom, Beautiful Shame: Where “Black” Meets “Queer” and The Queer Child (Duke University Press) — were national finalists for the Lambda Literary Award in LGBT Studies. In addition, her book Making Out (NYU Press) was a 2020 national finalist for the Next Generation Indie Book Award for memoir.
Stockton has taught at Cornell University's School of Criticism and Theory and, along with her university's top teaching award, she has received the Equality Utah Allies Award for LGBT activism, the NOW Lifetime Achievement Award, the YWCA Outstanding Achievement Award in Arts and Communication, the Crompton Noll Prize for Best Essay in Gay and Lesbian Studies from the Modern Language Association, and the Rosenblatt Prize for Excellence, the highest honor granted by the University of Utah.
Under the heading " Congress Insists That the Child Must Be Harmed," the first chapter of Stockton's book The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century (2009), discusses the Rind et al. (1998) controversy. She concludes powerfully that "Congress, it would seem, has acted only once to resolve against science: in order to say that children must be harmed." (p. 71). Stockton can be seen and heard speaking about her theory of the queer child in 2014 via Youtube, at a recorded conference hosted by the Center for European Studies at The University of Texas, Austin. In this session titled "Youth Sexual Rights," Stockton is the first speaker, followed by Prof. Thomas Hubbard reading a paper by the absent Prof. Gert Hekma (now deceased), followed by historian of Peter Schult Prof. Florian Mildenberger, and Robert Tiexera.[1]
Selected Publications
- Kathryn Bond Stockton, “Growing Sideways, or Versions of the Queer Child: The Ghost, the Homosexual, the Freudian, the Innocent, and the Interval of Animal,” in Curiouser: On The Queerness of Children, eds. Steven Bruhm and Natasha Hurley (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 2004).
- Kathryn Bond Stockton, (2007). "Feeling Like Killing?: Queer Temporalities of Murderous Motives among Queer Children." GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 301-325.
- Kathryn Bond Stockton, The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century (Duke University Press: Durham, 2009).
- Stockton, (2016). The Queer Child Now and Its Paradoxical Global Effects, in GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, pp. 505-539. [Part of a special issue; see the introduction here].
"Anglo-America, caught in a dream from which it won't awake, is steeped in fantasies of vaporous innocence. These are largely suburban-driven fantasies, however they seep into national discourse. Thus, parental “terror” in the global north can still fixate on sexualization, worrisome signs of children’s being sexual(ized): not on hordes of children taking to the streets, living in the streets, running on the loose while they protest labor conditions, dominate festivals, or rather gleefully rampage shopping malls, as they do in Egypt" [...]
"Why did I call it [the Child] a creature of delay? Because it could only state itself publicly, whatever it is, as something it was — “I was a gay child” — only after its straight life died, after a teen or adult “came out.” That is, the gay child was precisely ghostly because it could not live in the present tense, even though it often consciously, secretly had a relationship with the word gay — or with the word’s vague associations and connotations, without the word itself. In this respect, the gay child dramatized, intensified the bold dynamics of delay for every child, being held up in such intense ways. [...] Now delay is dwindling." (p. 507).
"Child sexuality, alongside the gay child, is ever more emerging from its shadow states, to the dismay of so many parents. [...] Indeed, a large group of US sex offenders is composed of children: kids texting pictures of their bodies to each other. [...] One can almost hear a collective plea from parents, at least these parents, who are crying out: is there a child some where who is innocent and, yes, maybe sexual, and wants our protections?" (p. 508).
- Kathryn Bond Stockton & Alejandra Josiowicz. (2021). “‘How “The Child” Turned Me Sideways’: An Interview with Queer Theorist Kathryn Bond Stockton.” Mistral: Journal of Latin American Women’s Intellectual & Cultural History, 1(2): 108-112.
Q. What has changed since the publication of The Queer Child, in 2009? What hasn’t changed?
A. It certainly appears that the ghostly “gay” child of the twentieth century - the child who couldn’t be - the child who could only be birthed backwards inside adulthood - is now present-tense. I hear people say what was never then said, “I think my child is gay,” supplanting the earlier, telling phrasing of “I think my child may grow up to be gay.” There’s so much public talk about affirming LGBT “kids” and “youth”. [...]
But then I look more closely. Yes, there is certainly talk, coverage, and exploration of all these changes in the public sphere. It can feel explosive. Twitter is abuzz, as are the New York Times and the cinematic universe. Yet, there’s something lagging. Embrace can be shallow. Backlash is billowing in the US. This year was the year of transgender sports bills banning trans girls from all school sports. Happening now and truly aflame is the phony attack on Critical Race Theory, which opponents haven’t read. And, as you might guess, the rise of “non-binary” is stirring the pot for all those lovers of the binary system (boy/girl, man/woman) that, as a system, is constantly referenced by the word “non-binary”. Not to mention that talk of “gay” and “trans” children is almost always scrubbed of any kind of reference to children’s sexuality. “LGBT youth” is wonderfully cloaking the matters it would name. (p. 109).
See also
- Clifford J. Rosky. (2013). Fear of the Queer Child, 61 Buffalo Law Review. 607. - Useful article discussing the history of fear around "queer" children, discussing Stockton's work alongside David Halperin's and others, whilst conscious of the history of pederasty.
- Steven Angelides - fellow winner of the Crompton Noll Prize; both authors cite each other's work, and Stockton gave an endorsement printed on the back cover of Angelides' 2019 book The Fear of Child Sexuality: Young People, Sex, and Agency.
- Rachel Hope Cleves - Historian who mentions Stockton's work within wider debates around age-gap sex.
References
- ↑ See, Nov 23, 2014, Session 4: Youth Sexual Rights (UT CES, Youtube).