Moral Recruitment

From NewgonWiki
Revision as of 12:09, 3 July 2023 by The Admins (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Moral Recruitment''' is the act of socially and politically mobilizing part of a population (for example, women or parents) towards a goal that serves the interests of the recruiter (for example, governments, NGOs and/or the medical establishment). Typically, a series of '''emotional appeals''' are made by the recruiter/s, in order to convince the target population that taking a particular course of action is not only necessary and in their best interests, but a "matt...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Moral Recruitment is the act of socially and politically mobilizing part of a population (for example, women or parents) towards a goal that serves the interests of the recruiter (for example, governments, NGOs and/or the medical establishment). Typically, a series of emotional appeals are made by the recruiter/s, in order to convince the target population that taking a particular course of action is not only necessary and in their best interests, but a "matter of urgency".

Moral recruitment may act in direct antagonism against (and competition with) more direct forms of recruitment (financial, for example - prostitution). Thus, it is arguable that moral recruiters have a vested interest in the perpetuation of social stigmas (female "purity" discourse) that attach a negative value to "undesirable" forms of recruitment (i.e. juvenile "prostitution").

The concept was mentioned by M. Rodríguez García in a 2012 paper analyzing the League of Nations' response to trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and girls.[1]

See also

References

  1. [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-social-history/article/league-of-nations-and-the-moral-recruitment-of-women/0ECB3BE9537BEE738B3F5BA91D07AC91 Rodríguez García, M. (2012). The League of Nations and the Moral Recruitment of Women. International Review of Social History, 57(S20), 97-128. doi:10.1017/S0020859012000442]