User talk:Matthewyoung

Pandering

I can't allow obvious pandering such as a disclaimer template in any kind of wide use throughout the project, as it conflicts with what is understood to be its purpose. The changes to the memes page, which are ongoing represent about the limit I am willing to go in that direction.

It would be great if you could edit in such a way that I don't have to bulk revert good edits with bad ones, as I am suffering with a condition that limits screen time, and can't sift through it all. Simply replacing SJW with liberal, or SJW with anti isn't feasible. In some cases "liberal-left antis" might suffice, or "liberal left" with "otherwise inclusive conceptions of social justice and identity".

Contributing articles on alternative texts is also an important part of becoming an editor here. There is much that still needs to be written on, to allow MAPs and Allies of all persuasions to find something on here that fits with their worldview and experience. --The Admins (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

"SJW" is such a powerful, well-recognized term, that it directs attention of the reader. I would suggest using it in quotations at select points to do just that. --The Admins (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

MAP-Wiki

I was to suggest you apply for membership at the less popular MAP-Wiki, where you could very carefully negotiate removal of misinformation in exchange for removal of criticism here, as a gesture of goodwill (all agreed prior to the editing). But unfortunately, since I formed this opinion, further developments have revealed the two main editors there to be hostile parties (as in, hostile to most members of our community) and disruptive in nature. --The Admins (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)