Stephanie Dallam: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
cat
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Stephanie Dallam R.N., M.S.N. ([http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1316/1410106376_8755e6eb7e.jpg%3Fv%3D0&imgrefurl=http://www.flickr.com/photos/angelashelton/1410106376/&h=375&w=500&sz=110&hl=en&start=1&sig2=okMzazTlrPjAQUZvMoWWkA&um=1&tbnid=SJfP_c-GDfRECM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=130&ei=tIgwSOSPMI3C0QSQuPDKAQ&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dstephanie%2Bdallam%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN picture]) is a child-protection zealot who attempts to foist herself off as a clinical author on child trauma. The end result of most of her writings can be said to represent a shade of pseudoscience falling somewhere in between that of [[David Finkelhor]] and [[Judith Reisman]] - a sex-fascist homophobe and pedophile-obsessed revisionist of [[Alfred Kinsey]].
[[Image:Sdallam.png|thumb|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has thus far been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].


Dallam, who is allied to a pseudomedical, victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is also said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]
Dallam, who is the current secretary of a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".<ref>http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA</ref>


==Rind "Debunking"==
Dallam's quotes in the media suggest that she sees herself as part of a [[pedophilia]] [[science war]]:


She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 [http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html paper] that attempted to frame the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) as advocacy propaganda. What - apart from the numerous misrepresentations - is most surprising about this paper, is that the author felt that she could base a large portion of her critique around what appeared to be a guilt-by-association argument, and then accuse the other of abusing protocols of science for the purpose of non-existent advocacy.
:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm</ref>


[[Category:Anti-paedophile activists]]
:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''<ref>http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm</ref>
[[Category:Academics]]
 
:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm</ref>
 
==Rind "debunking"==
 
She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper<ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.
 
==References==
 
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]

Latest revision as of 01:12, 16 September 2022

Stephanie Dallam

Stephanie Dallam R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a victimological point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding Child Abuse. Lacking the mainstream credibility of David Finkelhor and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of Judith Reisman, Dallam has thus far been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on Bruce Rind.

Dallam, who is the current secretary of a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as The Leadership Council, is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[1]

Dallam's quotes in the media suggest that she sees herself as part of a pedophilia science war:

""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""[2]
""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""[3]
"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."[4]

Rind "debunking"

She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper[5] that attempted to "debunk" the work of Rind et al (also see Research) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

References