One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
VigilancePrime: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''VigilancePrime''' is a now-banned user on [[Wikipedia]]. | '''VigilancePrime''' is a now-banned user on [[Wikipedia censorship of MAP related topics|Wikipedia]]. | ||
==Career== | ==Career== | ||
4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to [[Child Sexual Abuse]], from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to ''Neutral Point of View'' policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with [[Richard Weiss]]. | 4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit of colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to [[Child Sexual Abuse]], from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to ''Neutral Point of View'' policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with [[Richard Weiss]]. | ||
==Ban & | ==Ban & justification== | ||
April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between [[ArbCom]]-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops. | April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between [[ArbCom]]-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The ban was administered by Dmcdevit. | The ban was administered by Dmcdevit. | ||
==See | ==See also== | ||
*[[ | *[[Wikipedia censorship of MAP related topics]] | ||
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Wikipedians]][[Category:Censorship]] | [[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Wikipedians]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:People: Unknown Nationality]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:19, 7 May 2023
VigilancePrime is a now-banned user on Wikipedia.
Career
4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit of colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to Child Sexual Abuse, from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to Neutral Point of View policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with Richard Weiss.
Ban & justification
April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between ArbCom-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops.
The ban was administered by Dmcdevit.