VigilancePrime: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''VigilancePrime''' is a now-banned user on [[Wikipedia]]. | '''VigilancePrime''' is a now-banned user on [[Wikipedia censorship of MAP related topics|Wikipedia]]. | ||
==Career== | ==Career== | ||
4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to [[Child Sexual Abuse]], from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to ''Neutral Point of View'' policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with [[Richard Weiss]]. | 4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit of colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to [[Child Sexual Abuse]], from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to ''Neutral Point of View'' policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with [[Richard Weiss]]. | ||
==Ban & | ==Ban & justification== | ||
April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between [[ArbCom]]-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops. | April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between [[ArbCom]]-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The ban was administered by Dmcdevit. | The ban was administered by Dmcdevit. | ||
==See | ==See also== | ||
*[[ | *[[Wikipedia censorship of MAP related topics]] | ||
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Wikipedians]][[Category:Censorship]] | [[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Wikipedians]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:People: Unknown Nationality]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:19, 7 May 2023
VigilancePrime is a now-banned user on Wikipedia.
Career
4850 Edits on general Wikipedia articles. VigilancePrime had a habit of colourful, outspoken commentary in most areas, but made more friends than enemies along the way. The editor participated in articles related to Child Sexual Abuse, from a non-sympathiser standpoint, but upset some other editors because of a strict adherence to Neutral Point of View policy. VigilancePrime was known to have a volatile relationship with Richard Weiss.
Ban & justification
April 26, 2008. "Pedophilia related disruption". This was possibly the worst-ever decision by the Wikipedia administration in relation to these matters, with administrators bullying the editor into not editing certain topics and using the following infraction as justification for a ban. The number of blocks and unblocks also demonstrates the chasm of sensibility between ArbCom-whipped administrators and uncorrupted sysops.
The ban was administered by Dmcdevit.