Debate Guide: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rez (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(49 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTITLE____NOTOC__
:'''''You are viewing an incomplete version of Debate Guide. For a fuller version, see [http://debate-guide.com here].'''''
{|class="boilerplate" id="pd" style="width:80%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; margin: 0 auto; border:2px solid #188721; padding:5px; background-color:#bbf6c1;" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4"
:''[http://newgon.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=506 Feedback Forum available]''
|<center>
[[Image:Debateheader.png|link=]]
Our Debate Guide summarizes arguments and counter arguments encountered online by [[Minor Attracted Person|MAP]]s and Allies. We also broach the adjacent topic of youth choice within the sphere of minor-adult physical relationships. We will also advise you and link out to useful resources on these topics. Why not consider [[Introduction to Debate Guide|'''reading our introduction''']] or [[NewgonWiki:Getting involved|'''getting involved''']] in the wider wiki project?</center>
|}
<p></p>
{|id="mp-upper" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px; background:none;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width:50%; border:2px solid #188721; background:white; vertical-align:top; color:white;"|
{|id="mp-left" width="100%"; cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:white;"


Debate Guide is a growing list of arguments and counter arguments for the sexual emancipation of minors and minor attracted adults.
! <h2 id="mp-tfa-h2" style="margin:0; background:#188721; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:white; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Advice</h2>
|-
|style="color:#000;"| <div id="mp-tfa">{{Debate Guide:Advice}}</div>
|-
! <h2 id="mp-otd-h2" style="margin:0; background:#188721; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:white; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Arguments about attraction to minors</h2>
|-
|style="color:#000;"| <div id="mp-otd">{{Debate Guide:Arguments about attraction to minors}}</div>
|-
! <h2 id="mp-dyk-h2" style="margin:0; background:#188721; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; text-align:left; color:white; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Arguments about young people, minors, children</h2>
|-
|style="color:#000;"| <div id="mp-dyk">{{Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors}}</div>
|}
|style="border:1px solid transparent"|<!--
--------------------------------2nd Column------------------------------->
| class="MainPageBG" style="width:50%; border:2px solid #188721; background:white; vertical-align:top;"|
{|id="mp-right" width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background:white;"
! <h2 id="mp-itn-h2" style="margin:0; background:#188721; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:white; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Arguments about adult-minor relationships</h2>
|-
|style="color:#000;"| <div id="mp-itn">{{Debate Guide:Arguments about adult-minor relationships}}</div>
|-
! <h2 id="mp-otd-h2" style="margin:0; background:#188721; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #a3b0bf; text-align:left; color:white; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Other arguments</h2>
|-
|style="color:#000;"| <div id="mp-otd">{{Debate Guide:Other arguments}}</div>
|}
|}
<p></p>
{|class="boilerplate" id="pd" style="width:92%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; margin: 0 auto; border:2px solid #188721; padding:5px; background-color:#bbf6c1;" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4"
|<center>
<div style="font-size:162%; border:none; margin:0; padding:.1em; color:#000;">Thank you for reading</div>
You may also find some other parts of the Wiki useful in debate situations. Check our [[Research|research]] anthologies for highly citable scientific articles on this subject. Our [[:Category: Official Encyclopedia|encyclopedia]] contains an easy to use database of all the individuals and organizations of interest to those who follow our [[Ethos of Newgon|ethos]]. [[Accounts and Testimonies|Our database of lived experiences]] lists personal testimonies intended to be used as evidence of positive relationships.  


It also functions as centre for advice, links and external debate resources pertaining to these issues and the age of consent.
Debate Guide was written by a [[History and credits (Debate Guide)|'''range of authors during the years 2006-24''']]. If you are not pleased with the quality of Debate Guide, consider [[NewgonWiki:Getting involved|getting involved]]. From the simplest of corrections to the most complex of new arguments, we want to hear from you, so please consider signing up for the [[PCMA]] [[Help:Joining PCMA chat|chat service]], where we have people present.</center>
|}


==Introduction==
[[fr:Guide de débat]]
 
===[[Introduction to Debate Guide]]===
 
==General Advisory==
 
===[[Starting a Debate]]===
 
===Responding to Arguments===
 
*[[Debate Guide: Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality|Logical Fallacies and Intergenerational Sexuality]]
*[[Debate Guide: Respond to Misdefinition|Respond to Misdefinition]] and [[Debate Guide: Myths|Myths]].
*[[Debate Guide: Respond to Rhetoric|Respond to Rhetoric]]
*[[Debate Guide: Social Constructionism|Social Constructionism]]
*[[False dichotomy]] - Encyclopedia article on the use of false opposites.
*[[Debate Guide: Other trends worth considering|Other trends worth considering]]
 
==Arguments: Assertive and Defensive==
 
==="Minor" Arguments===
 
*[[Debate Guide: Evolutionary Logic|Evolutionary Logic]] - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
*[[Debate Guide: Sexual Neglect|Sexual Neglect]].
*[[Debate Guide: Reverse Sexualisation|Reverse Sexualisation]] - Acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
*[[Debate Guide: Liberty-Empowerment|Liberty-Empowerment]] - Empower young people with the freedom to learn.
*[[Debate Guide: Cyclical Paternalism|Cyclical Paternalism]] - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
*[[Debate Guide: Prior Experience|Prior Experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
*[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "Sexual Maturity"|The fallacy of "Sexual Maturity"]]
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive Ability|Cognitive Ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Online Dangers|Online Dangers]] - Argues against the idea of the internet being a dangerous place for minors.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
 
==="Adult" Arguments===
 
*[[Debate Guide: All child molesters are pedophiles|All child molesters are pedophiles]]
 
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Example Assertive|Example Assertive]]
 
==="Minor-Attraction" Arguments===
 
*[[Debate Guide: Example Assertive|Example Assertive]]
 
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Pedophiles chose their condition|Pedophiles chose their condition]]
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Pedophilia is unnatural|Pedophilia is unnatural]]
 
===Peripheral Arguments===
 
*[[Debate Guide: Child Abuse Industry|Child Abuse Industry]]
*[[Debate Guide: The Professional Victim|The Professional Victim]]
*[[Debate Guide: The nature of Human Attraction|The nature of Human Attraction]] - Why humans have a ''capacity'' for diverse taste.
*[[Debate Guide: The Hypocritical Establishment|The Hypocritical Establishment]] - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous.
*[[Debate Guide: Sexual Repression as a tool of the State|Sexual Repression as a tool of the State]]
*[[Debate Guide: Historical Nonadult-Adult sex|Historical Nonadult-Adult sex]]
*[[Adverse effects of hysteria]]
*[[Debate Guide: Self-Loathing Hatred|Self-Loathing Hatred]]
*[[Debate Guide: Parenthood and Pedophilia|Parenthood and Pedophilia]]
*[[Debate Guide: Abuse of Language|Abuse of Language]]
*[[Debate Guide: Problems with the Age of Consent|Problems with the Age of Consent]]
*[[SOR Problems]] - Argues against the [[Sex Offenders' Register]]
 
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: All Good Parents Would Know|All Good Parents Would Know]] - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgements.
 
==Debate Resources==
 
===[[Research]]===
 
A collection of scientific research and other demonstrative references on matters relevant to minor sexuality.
 
===[[Links (Debate Guide)]]===
 
Links that have some relevance to debating the issues contained within the guide.
 
===[[Links (Fora)]]===
 
Applicable forums and some examples of debates on the issues covered.
 
==About the Guide==
 
===What's new?===
 
See '''[[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]]'''.
 
===[http://newgon.com/feedback.php Feedback]===
 
===[[History and Credits (Debate Guide)]]===
 
==Newgon.com: Useful Stuff==
 
*[[People and Organisations]]
 
*[[Accounts and Testimonies]]
 
*[[Research]]
 
==Not Pleased?==
 
''Contribute!'' From the simplest of corrections to the most complex of new arguments, we want to hear from you. Just drop by the Blog or Forum, or e-mail an administrator. You could even be given membership to edit this wiki!

Latest revision as of 19:37, 28 May 2024

Our Debate Guide summarizes arguments and counter arguments encountered online by MAPs and Allies. We also broach the adjacent topic of youth choice within the sphere of minor-adult physical relationships. We will also advise you and link out to useful resources on these topics. Why not consider reading our introduction or getting involved in the wider wiki project?

Advice

The task at hand...

Responding to others...

Arguments about attraction to minors

Too many people hold conflicting beliefs about attraction to minors...

Popular anti-MAP sentiments and common human flaws go hand in hand...

Human sexuality, including attraction to minors, is mischaracterized and misunderstood...

Arguments about young people, minors, children

People under the age of majority can be sexual...

Anti age-gap arguments are really anti-youth arguments...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Legal minors (who are supposedly too stupid to consent) are suddenly required to show enthusiasm for law reforms that antis dispute, but not ones that take their rights away.
  • Against: Teen brain - Ideas of a distinct, or inferior "teen brain" are value-laden, outdated western pseudoscience.
  • Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" or "between minors" sexual orientation.

Sexually repressing minors does not benefit them...

  • Against: Online dangers - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.
  • Reverse sexualization - Popular acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
  • Turn of events - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.

From the encyclopedia...

Arguments about adult-minor relationships

Age of Consent laws are a blunt instrument...
  • Against: Legal pragmatism - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".

Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...

Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...

Other societies and species are points of interest...

Many people also speak from direct experience...

Other arguments

Other arguments don't relate fundamentally to attractions, minors or relationships, and instead focus on the debate itself, and its key participants...
  • State hypocrisy - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous.
  • Abuse of language - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes.
  • Blame game - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats.

Debate Guide is a work in progress, and some material is undeveloped...

From the encyclopedia...

Thank you for reading

You may also find some other parts of the Wiki useful in debate situations. Check our research anthologies for highly citable scientific articles on this subject. Our encyclopedia contains an easy to use database of all the individuals and organizations of interest to those who follow our ethos. Our database of lived experiences lists personal testimonies intended to be used as evidence of positive relationships.

Debate Guide was written by a range of authors during the years 2006-24. If you are not pleased with the quality of Debate Guide, consider getting involved. From the simplest of corrections to the most complex of new arguments, we want to hear from you, so please consider signing up for the PCMA chat service, where we have people present.