One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Contact-neutral: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) for now |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MAI}}__NOTOC__'''Contact-neutral''' (or '''neutral-contact''' or '''neutral-c''') is a term used to describe a person - often a [[Minor Attracted Person|MAP]] or ally, as expressing no opinion on minor-adult physical/sexual relations. Those who are contact-neutral oppose being labeled as '''[[anti-contact]] (anti- | {{MAI}}__NOTOC__'''Contact-neutral''' (or '''neutral-contact, contact-agnostic''' or '''neutral-c''') is a term used to describe a person - often a [[Minor Attracted Person|MAP]] or ally, as expressing no decisive opinion on minor-adult physical/sexual relations. Those who are contact-neutral oppose being labeled as '''[[anti-contact|anti-c]] (anti-contact)''' or '''[[pro-c]] (pro-[[consent]]/choice/contact)'''. | ||
There are many reasons one may identify as contact-neutral, such as not having developed a strong opinion, the refusal to participate in contact discourse, and/or wanting to remain apolitical. | |||
Some [[Essay:Pro-Reform: The Rational Middle Ground|pro-reform]] individuals also use "neutral-c", because while they favor changes in social attitudes on relations between minors and adults, they believe changes to laws must follow the addressing of power imbalances for example. | |||
==Contact-neutral organizations== | ==Contact-neutral organizations== | ||
*[[B4U-ACT]] - takes a neutral stance on contact discourse, preferring to focus on mental health and the stigma of minor-attraction. | *[[B4U-ACT]] - takes a neutral stance on contact discourse, preferring to focus on mental health and the [[Research: The Dangers of Stigma|stigma]] of minor-attraction. | ||
*Various community forums, chats and [[Pediverse|instances]] have resorted to banning pro-c and sometimes also anti-c commentary to maintain decorum. These communities tend to lean anti-c both in their management and membership. "Pro-reform" individuals generally oppose these limitations. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 16 June 2024
 | |||||||
| Part of NewgonWiki's series on minor-attracted identities | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Starting Guide | Community | Pediverse MAP | NOMAP | AAM | Neologisms "MAP" Origins | Flag | Movement Political history: MAP & LGBT Alliances Philias: Ephebo - Hebe - Pedo - Nepio Gender and attraction: BL - EL - GL Pederasty/Gay BL | Korephilia/Lesbian GL Pro-c | Neutral-c | Anti-c BLogo | GLogo | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Category: Minor-attracted people | |||||||
| Template:MAI - This template |
Contact-neutral (or neutral-contact, contact-agnostic or neutral-c) is a term used to describe a person - often a MAP or ally, as expressing no decisive opinion on minor-adult physical/sexual relations. Those who are contact-neutral oppose being labeled as anti-c (anti-contact) or pro-c (pro-consent/choice/contact).
There are many reasons one may identify as contact-neutral, such as not having developed a strong opinion, the refusal to participate in contact discourse, and/or wanting to remain apolitical.
Some pro-reform individuals also use "neutral-c", because while they favor changes in social attitudes on relations between minors and adults, they believe changes to laws must follow the addressing of power imbalances for example.
Contact-neutral organizations
- B4U-ACT - takes a neutral stance on contact discourse, preferring to focus on mental health and the stigma of minor-attraction.
- Various community forums, chats and instances have resorted to banning pro-c and sometimes also anti-c commentary to maintain decorum. These communities tend to lean anti-c both in their management and membership. "Pro-reform" individuals generally oppose these limitations.