Talk:SJWs Always Lie: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:The article on Vox Day's book is relevant for obvious reasons - not only the authors (one of whom we have profiled), but how an insurgent movement (the New Right) has moved away from defending itself against #metoo type attacks, to its own uptight moralism. It speaks to the capture and splitting of movements.
:The article on Vox Day's book is relevant for obvious reasons - not only the authors (one of whom we have profiled), but how an insurgent movement (the New Right) has moved away from defending itself against #metoo type attacks, to its own uptight moralism. It speaks to the capture and splitting of movements.


:I believe it was initially mentioned by Manstuprator on BoyChat, started by Thorn (from B4UACT) and added historical context.
:I believe it was initially mentioned by Manstuprator on BoyChat, started by Thorn (from B4UACT forum) and added historical context.


:Further, I would add that I have also seen allies attacked by SJWs, and been in the midst of those type of attacks myself. The phenomenon has a special character of its own (the weaponization of victimhood) and is similar to [[Validity Policing]] by LGBT people. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 11:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
:Further, I would add that I have also seen allies attacked by SJWs, and been in the midst of those type of attacks myself. The phenomenon has a special character of its own (the weaponization of victimhood) and is similar to [[Validity Policing]] by LGBT people. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 11:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:45, 4 May 2023

This page is not notable to MAPs or MAP activism. It should be deleted.

The article on Vox Day's book is relevant for obvious reasons - not only the authors (one of whom we have profiled), but how an insurgent movement (the New Right) has moved away from defending itself against #metoo type attacks, to its own uptight moralism. It speaks to the capture and splitting of movements.
I believe it was initially mentioned by Manstuprator on BoyChat, started by Thorn (from B4UACT forum) and added historical context.
Further, I would add that I have also seen allies attacked by SJWs, and been in the midst of those type of attacks myself. The phenomenon has a special character of its own (the weaponization of victimhood) and is similar to Validity Policing by LGBT people. --The Admins (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)