Talk:MAPocalypse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "Is this 100k views hostile twitter thread enough visibility to go in the timeline? https://twitter.com/RoisinMichaux/status/1657702201416884224 The paper Michaux is pissed about is here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244018806036 and the professor in question is [https://www.up.ac.za/private-law/article/2919182/professor-ann-skelton extremely distinguished]. May be of interest and worth adding.--~~~~" |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this 100k views hostile twitter thread enough visibility to go in the timeline? https://twitter.com/RoisinMichaux/status/1657702201416884224 The paper Michaux is pissed about is here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244018806036 and the professor in question is [https://www.up.ac.za/private-law/article/2919182/professor-ann-skelton extremely distinguished]. May be of interest and worth adding.--[[User:Prue|Prue]] ([[User talk:Prue|talk]]) 02:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC) | Is this 100k views hostile twitter thread enough visibility to go in the timeline? https://twitter.com/RoisinMichaux/status/1657702201416884224 The paper Michaux is pissed about is here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244018806036 and the professor in question is [https://www.up.ac.za/private-law/article/2919182/professor-ann-skelton extremely distinguished]. May be of interest and worth adding.--[[User:Prue|Prue]] ([[User talk:Prue|talk]]) 02:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:2M+ is probably what we would need, given what it takes to generate wider media attention. | |||
:The 3 recent additions are really too long and have nothing to do with the normalization of pedophilia (it was not a predominant theme of the coverage). Epstein, Allen and Prince Andrew probably all need their own articles with a treatment considerably less that Wikipedia, and focus on any verifiable information that should be emphasized, or is not well covered elsewhere. Are you able to create them? --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 08:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:54, 23 May 2023
Is this 100k views hostile twitter thread enough visibility to go in the timeline? https://twitter.com/RoisinMichaux/status/1657702201416884224 The paper Michaux is pissed about is here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244018806036 and the professor in question is extremely distinguished. May be of interest and worth adding.--Prue (talk) 02:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- 2M+ is probably what we would need, given what it takes to generate wider media attention.
- The 3 recent additions are really too long and have nothing to do with the normalization of pedophilia (it was not a predominant theme of the coverage). Epstein, Allen and Prince Andrew probably all need their own articles with a treatment considerably less that Wikipedia, and focus on any verifiable information that should be emphasized, or is not well covered elsewhere. Are you able to create them? --The Admins (talk) 08:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)