Template:EGLConsent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
File:PredictiveValidity2.jpg|Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued | File:PredictiveValidity2.jpg|Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued | ||
File:FinkelhorMoralFailure.png|[[David Finkelhor]] (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument | File:FinkelhorMoralFailure.png|[[David Finkelhor]] (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument | ||
Ehmanconsent.png|Robert Ehman on the failed circular "consent" argument | |||
Ehmanconsentbinary.png|Robert Ehman on the real reasons for consent vs no consent binarism | |||
File:Powerimbalance.jpg|[[Terry Leahy]]: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex | File:Powerimbalance.jpg|[[Terry Leahy]]: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex | ||
File:Power-imbalance-consent.jpg|[[Paul Okami]] on Power Imbalance argument (from ''Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)'') | File:Power-imbalance-consent.jpg|[[Paul Okami]] on Power Imbalance argument (from ''Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)'') | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | ||
File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | ||
File:Fouca.png|Foucault, 1978 | |||
File:AngelidesPowerInequality.jpg|[[Steven Angelides]] on Power Imbalance argument from [https://web.archive.org/web/20130410124803/http://snifferdogonline.com/reports/Child%20Abuse,%20Sexuality%20and%20Violence/Feminism,%20Child%20Sexual%20Abuse,%20and%20the%20Erasure%20of%20Child%20Sexuality.pdf Feminism, Child Sexual Abuse, and the Erasure of Child Sexuality] (2004) | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:52, 4 July 2024
-
Bruce Rind on CSA concept (in)validity -
Rind on lack of predictive validity for informed consent/CSA concept invalidity -
Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued -
David Finkelhor (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument -
Robert Ehman on the failed circular "consent" argument -
Robert Ehman on the real reasons for consent vs no consent binarism -
Terry Leahy: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex -
Paul Okami on Power Imbalance argument (from Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)) -
Review of Sandfort and consent -
Scott De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors: Consent dogma -
Foucault, 1978 -
Steven Angelides on Power Imbalance argument from Feminism, Child Sexual Abuse, and the Erasure of Child Sexuality (2004)
