Hebephilia: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MAI}}__NOTOC__'''Hebephilia''' is an erotic age preference ([[chronophilia]]) for pubescent youth, usually between 11-14 years of age. It is often used to distinguish an attraction to pubescents from an attraction to either prepubescent, | {{MAI}}__NOTOC__'''Hebephilia''' is an erotic age preference ([[chronophilia]]) for pubescent youth, usually between 11-14 years of age. It is often used to distinguish an attraction to pubescents from an attraction to either prepubescent, or postpubescent youth (described as [[pedophilia]] and [[ephebophilia]] respectively). A person with such attractions is called a '''hebephile'''. Researchers connected to [[CAMH]] tend to distinguish hebephilia ("preference for 11–14 year-olds") from ephebophilia ("preference for 15–19 year-olds").<ref>Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., Dickey, R., & Klassen, P. E. (2009). "Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-V," ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'', 38(3), 335-350.</ref> These age ranges are approximate, as the boundaries of puberty vary from person to person. There is presently no medical diagnosis of hebephilia, although as detailed by [[Wikipedia:Hebephilia|Wikipedia]], there have been recent, unsuccessful attempts to pathologize it. | ||
==Etymology== | ==Etymology== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
In 2009, Psychologist [[Ray Blanchard]] argued for a distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia based on [[plethysmography]] studies. He suggested that these two categories should be pathologised as a single disorder (pedohebephilia) in the [[DSM]]. This attracted controversy from others in the field, such as [[Karen Franklin]], who argued that hebephilia represents a normative adaptation from an evolutionary science perspective. The full details of the controversy are covered in the Wikipedia article below. | In 2009, Psychologist [[Ray Blanchard]] argued for a distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia based on [[plethysmography]] studies. He suggested that these two categories should be pathologised as a single disorder (pedohebephilia) in the [[DSM]]. This attracted controversy from others in the field, such as [[Karen Franklin]], who argued that hebephilia represents a normative adaptation from an evolutionary science perspective. The full details of the controversy are covered in the Wikipedia article below. | ||
American psychologist [[Bruce Rind]] and Scottish queer theorist [[Richard Yuill]], summarized the large amount of critiques up to that time, and argued extensively against the idea that hebephilia is pathological.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/rind-yuill-hebephilia Rind, Bruce, & Yuill Richard. "Hebephilia as Mental Disorder?" ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'', Jun 28 2012]</ref> A further critique was published in 2015 by historian Simon Goldhill, in his article '''The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?'''.<ref>Simon Goldhill, [https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1007/s10508-015-0556-7 ‘The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?’], in ''Archives of Sexual Behaviour'', 44:5 (2015), 1099-1108 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0556-7>.</ref> | American psychologist [[Bruce Rind]] and Scottish queer theorist [[Richard Yuill]], summarized the large amount of critiques up to that time, and argued extensively against the idea that hebephilia is pathological.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/rind-yuill-hebephilia Rind, Bruce, & Yuill Richard. "Hebephilia as Mental Disorder?" ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'', Jun 28 2012]</ref> A further critique was published in 2015 by historian [[Simon Goldhill]], in his article '''The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?'''.<ref>Simon Goldhill, [https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1007/s10508-015-0556-7 ‘The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?’], in ''Archives of Sexual Behaviour'', 44:5 (2015), 1099-1108 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0556-7>.</ref> | ||
==Prevalence== | ==Prevalence== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:18, 20 December 2024
 | |||||||
| Part of NewgonWiki's series on minor-attracted identities | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Starting Guide | Community | Pediverse MAP | NOMAP | AAM | Neologisms "MAP" Origins | Flag | Movement Political history: MAP & LGBT Alliances Philias: Ephebo - Hebe - Pedo - Nepio Gender and attraction: BL - EL - GL Pederasty/Gay BL | Korephilia/Lesbian GL Pro-c | Neutral-c | Anti-c BLogo | GLogo | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Category: Minor-attracted people | |||||||
| Template:MAI - This template |
Hebephilia is an erotic age preference (chronophilia) for pubescent youth, usually between 11-14 years of age. It is often used to distinguish an attraction to pubescents from an attraction to either prepubescent, or postpubescent youth (described as pedophilia and ephebophilia respectively). A person with such attractions is called a hebephile. Researchers connected to CAMH tend to distinguish hebephilia ("preference for 11–14 year-olds") from ephebophilia ("preference for 15–19 year-olds").[1] These age ranges are approximate, as the boundaries of puberty vary from person to person. There is presently no medical diagnosis of hebephilia, although as detailed by Wikipedia, there have been recent, unsuccessful attempts to pathologize it.
Etymology
The term comes from the Greek terms ἥβη (hḗbē, "youth") and φῐλος (philos, "love").
Controversy outline
In 2009, Psychologist Ray Blanchard argued for a distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia based on plethysmography studies. He suggested that these two categories should be pathologised as a single disorder (pedohebephilia) in the DSM. This attracted controversy from others in the field, such as Karen Franklin, who argued that hebephilia represents a normative adaptation from an evolutionary science perspective. The full details of the controversy are covered in the Wikipedia article below.
American psychologist Bruce Rind and Scottish queer theorist Richard Yuill, summarized the large amount of critiques up to that time, and argued extensively against the idea that hebephilia is pathological.[2] A further critique was published in 2015 by historian Simon Goldhill, in his article The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?.[3]
Prevalence
According to phallometric studies, equal or preferential hebephilia may have a prevalence of around 20% in men, (or more, should girls aged 13 and 14 be frequently featured in stimulus material).
Confusion with/distinction from Ephebophilia
Hebephilia was first mentioned in the 1950s[4], but barely used until the late 00s and 10s, when it was popularized by Blanchard and others in his field. It has been confused with, and distinguished from ephebophilia (a concept of questionable validity) in various ways - described in the article on said subject.
References
- ↑ Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., Dickey, R., & Klassen, P. E. (2009). "Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-V," Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3), 335-350.
- ↑ Rind, Bruce, & Yuill Richard. "Hebephilia as Mental Disorder?" Archives of Sexual Behavior, Jun 28 2012
- ↑ Simon Goldhill, ‘The Imperialism of Historical Arrogance: Where Is the Past in the DSM's Idea of Sexuality?’, in Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 44:5 (2015), 1099-1108 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0556-7>.
- ↑ Janssen, Diederik F. (2015). "'Chronophilia': Entries of Erotic Age Preference into Descriptive Psychopathology". Medical History. 59 (4): 575–98.
See also
External Links
- "Hebephilia" - Wikipedia article - describing the full controversy and various attempts to pathologize Hebephilia.