NOMAP: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==NOMAP-aligned organizations== | ==NOMAP-aligned organizations== | ||
*[[B4U-Act]] - Is a service provider for Non-Offending MAPs. | *[[B4U-Act]] - Is a service provider for Non-Offending MAPs. Their platform is NOMAP compatible, however the organization does not take an official [[anti-contact]] position. | ||
*[[Virtuous Pedophiles]] - Is an explicitly ACNOMAP/Medicalist organization. | *[[Virtuous Pedophiles]] - Is an explicitly ACNOMAP/Medicalist organization. | ||
*[[Prostasia Foundation]] - Technically, this is a charity that provides services to MAPs and not a MAP organization. | *[[Prostasia Foundation]] - Technically, this is a charity that provides services to MAPs and not a MAP organization. | ||
==Gateway Theory== | |||
There are varying takes on the merits and long-term survivability of NOMAP ideology. These include the view, shared by some neutral MAPs and allies, that while lacking in scientific merit, NOMAP ideology is one necessary part of a larger, credible movement. Older MAPs from pro-contact communities such as [[BoyChat]] tend to be dismissive towards this argument, refusing to grant NOMAP ideology any strategic credibility. | |||
<gallery> | |||
File:Counter-NOMAP.png|"Imminent Failure of NOMAP Ideology" reasons listed (Free Speech Tube). | |||
</gallery> | |||
We [[Newgon Support Team|welcome counter-arguments]] to the above. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 16:06, 5 May 2022
Part of NewgonWiki's series on minor-attracted identities | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Starting Guide | Community | Pediverse MAP | NOMAP | AAM | Neologisms "MAP" Origins | Flag | Movement Political history: MAP & LGBT Alliances Philias: Ephebo - Hebe - Pedo - Nepio Gender and attraction: BL - EL - GL Pederasty/Gay BL | Korephilia/Lesbian GL Pro-c | Neutral-c | Anti-c BLogo | GLogo | |||||||
| |||||||
Category: Minor-attracted people | |||||||
Template:MAI - This template |
NOMAP (Non-Offending Minor Attracted Person) or ACNOMAP (which specifies Anti-contact) are forks of the term Minor Attracted Person, used to elaborate that the user is non-offending.[1] Those who use it, feel they must declare upfront - their refusal to engage in unlawful sex with a minor or use child pornography/other prohibited materials where they are illegal. The term is essentially used as a synonym for anti-contact (anti-c), even though research from Bailey (2016) appears to indicate that just as high a proportion of pro-c MAPs are non-offending. Many NOMAPs advocate the use of drawn erotica or sex-dolls, because they feel they may have to use them at some point. Prostasia Foundation are one charity who have published articles on this topic.
This term is thought[2] to have gained in popularity during 2018 alongside the term MAP, during the the social-media enabled MAP Flag controversy. NOMAP attracts media attention across the political spectrum, due to its "entryist" implications.[3][4][5]
"NOMAP" has been criticized by some (particularly first-wave and early second-wave) MAP activists and allies, who refuse to accept a burden of proof on their behavior and deem it to have orwellian, medico-legal overtones.[6][7][8]
NOMAP-aligned organizations
- B4U-Act - Is a service provider for Non-Offending MAPs. Their platform is NOMAP compatible, however the organization does not take an official anti-contact position.
- Virtuous Pedophiles - Is an explicitly ACNOMAP/Medicalist organization.
- Prostasia Foundation - Technically, this is a charity that provides services to MAPs and not a MAP organization.
Gateway Theory
There are varying takes on the merits and long-term survivability of NOMAP ideology. These include the view, shared by some neutral MAPs and allies, that while lacking in scientific merit, NOMAP ideology is one necessary part of a larger, credible movement. Older MAPs from pro-contact communities such as BoyChat tend to be dismissive towards this argument, refusing to grant NOMAP ideology any strategic credibility.
-
"Imminent Failure of NOMAP Ideology" reasons listed (Free Speech Tube).
We welcome counter-arguments to the above.
See also
References
- ↑ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/NOMAP
- ↑ https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=NOMAP
- ↑ https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NOMAP
- ↑ https://www.reddit.com/r/justneckbeardthings/comments/8w2l42/just_a_gentle_reminder_that_this_is_a_thing_now/
- ↑ https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/g4xgmf/what_are_maps_and_nomaps_how_about_mappositivity/
- ↑ https://boychat.org/messages/1524550.htm
- ↑ https://boychat.org/messages/1524645.htm
- ↑ https://boychat.org/messages/1578924.htm