One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLConsent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | ||
File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | ||
File:Fouca.png|Foucault, 1978 | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 24 April 2023
-
Bruce Rind on CSA concept (in)validity -
Rind on lack of predictive validity for informed consent/CSA concept invalidity -
Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued -
David Finkelhor (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument -
Robert Ehman on the failed circular "consent" argument -
Robert Ehman on the real reasons for consent vs no consent binarism -
Terry Leahy: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex -
Paul Okami on Power Imbalance argument (from Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)) -
Review of Sandfort and consent -
Scott De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors: Consent dogma -
Foucault, 1978
