One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.

Preventionism: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jim Burton (talk | contribs)
Jim Burton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:
*[https://archive.is/qjnfy CSA primary prevention] - The censored Wikipedia article in full
*[https://archive.is/qjnfy CSA primary prevention] - The censored Wikipedia article in full
*[https://prostasia.org/blog/primary-prevention-basics/ Primary Prevention] - Dry as bones primer from a known MAP Author
*[https://prostasia.org/blog/primary-prevention-basics/ Primary Prevention] - Dry as bones primer from a known MAP Author
===Opinion===
*[https://time.com/6253908/america-child-sex-abuse-prevention/ Time Magazine on American CSA Prevention]


===Organizations and websites===
===Organizations and websites===

Revision as of 02:11, 7 September 2025

Klaus Beier - Sexologist, Project Dunkelfeld

CSA Preventionism, sometimes referred to as (CSA) primary prevention with respect to MAPs, is a philosophy within medicine, the mental health industry and public institutions, in which targeted interventions are made to pre-empt and prevent Child Sexual Abuse.[1]

Germany, with an already low Age of consent of 14, and large, state funded prevention projects, is seen as the "petri dish" for primary prevention of offending among pedohebephilic men. The most famous example of German preventionism is Prevention Project Dunkelfeld.

Controversy

Primary prevention of CSA remains a controversial idea as it involves a dialogue with the MAP Community, and efforts to reduce social stigmas, such as the supposition that all MAPs will inevitably "sexually assault children" and habitually deceive professionals as to their true intentions. The purgation of a highly detailed English Wikipedia article on the topic in 2023 is a good example of this controversy.[2]

The idea, when applied to pedophiles and hebephiles, is also controversial within the MAP Community. This is because preventionist philosophy appears to presuppose that attraction is the principal driver of behaviors. At the same time, we know that only a minority of child sexual offenders express preferential attractions to minors, and this number falls even further when one considers pedophilia alone. Preventionist philosophy has also been criticized as a totalizing blueprint for medical observation and control, fuelling undue suspicion. For example, Queer Theorists such as Richard Yuill and David Elliot[3] have made such criticisms in response to Sarah Goode.

Nevertheless, destigmatization of attraction to minors is one central tenet of preventionist philosophy, since MAPs have to be willing to come forward in making contact with a care provider. Preventionists will sometimes point out that their focus on self-aware MAPs owes to the willingness of such people to make contact with a therapist when compared for example, to a person who is inclined towards or at risk of situational offending.

Liberal media are generally approving of primary prevention

Mainstream and liberal media has shown a marked trend since around the 2010s to acknowledge pedophilia as a disorder or orientation and not a crime, under the proviso that pedophiles are "given help not to offend".[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]

Primary prevention targeting children: American schools

Extreme anti-contact point of view from a German Preventionist MAP on pediverse in 2023

Minors have often been targeted with primary prevention programs, particularly within the American context in the 1980s and 90s. However, more recently, these efforts have been modernized and integrated into broader child safety efforts, sex and relationships curricula. As early as 1992, German scholars were already highly critical of the American "child targeting" approach to prevention in schools, and did not recommend it for use in their own country.[23]

A problem with preventionism

What researchers say about primary prevention approaches.

  • Schmidt, A. F., & Niehaus, S. (2022). Outpatient Therapists’ Perspectives on Working with Persons Who Are Sexually Interested in Minors Archives of Sexual Behavior, DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02377-6
    “This exemplifies the–at least partly–diverging therapeutic foci between therapists and patients as therapists seem to prioritize sexual behavior regulation issues and sexual offense prevention, whereas MAPs experience problems with psychological well-being and stigmatization issues as more crucial (B4U-ACT, 2011; Levenson & Grady, 2019a). This divergence in therapeutic foci is likely among the reasons reason why MAPs are reluctant to seek professional help or report dissatisfaction with it (Levenson & Grady, 2019a).”
“In summary, our results further corroborate that MAPs’ reported fears of being stigmatized by (mental) health professionals are not unfounded (B4U-ACT, 2011; Levenson & Grady, 2019a).” [...] “In order to increase the chances of this underserved clientele finding access to professional help to deal with their considerable burden of psychological distress (Lawrence & Willis, 2021), particularly outpatient therapists who yet refuse to work with MAPs as well as future therapists in training should be made aware of the principles outlined in B4U-ACT (2020), Jahnke (2018a), and Levenson et al. (2020) who recommend guidelines to decrease stigmatization of MAPs and increase professional certainty and competences in therapeutically working with them.
"Many individuals with sexual interest in children express a desire for mental health services but represent an underserved client population. An identified barrier to service provision is mandatory reporting legislation. [...] [S]tigma towards people with sexual interest in children was associated with an increased likelihood of reporting. Clinicians were more likely to indicate that they would report the hypothetical client was viewing child sexual exploitation material and/or had access to children."

Groups who advocate for primary prevention

See also

Sourced primers from a preventionist perspective

Opinion

Organizations and websites

References

  1. TNF: Rant on primary Prevention
  2. Primary Prevention of CSA (old version), Primary Prevention of CSA (archive) and redirect
  3. Yuill, R., & Elliot, D. (2012). Researching and Theorizing the “Age Taboo” on Intergenerational Sexualities. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(1), 67–71.
  4. CBC on MAPs and Prevention
  5. BBC on young, non offending MAPs
  6. Anon on their own pedophilic feelings
  7. Can paedophiles be good people? We flinch, but there are varying degrees
  8. NSPCC: Use "Paedophilia" with caution
  9. Pedophilia Is a Mental Health Issue. It's Still Not Treated as One (Vice)
  10. Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not A Crime (NDTV)
  11. What Science Reveals About Pedophilia (Daily Beast)
  12. Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime (NYT)
  13. I, Pedophile
  14. What Can Be Done About...
  15. Telegraph article on the infamous Cambridge Conference
  16. Our approach to pedophilia isn't working - Salon
  17. I’m a pedophile, but not a monster - Todd Nickerson in Salon, see also this interview in Salon
  18. National Review defends Salon's Nickerson piece
  19. Mail Online sympathetic piece from Right-Wing tabloid
  20. I'm a normal guy. I just fancy six-year-olds - another bizarre DM piece
  21. Vice - A Child Rape Victim on Why Society Should Be More Empathetic to Pedophiles
  22. Independent: Paedophilia is 'fate, not a choice', leading scientist (Klaus Beier) claims
  23. How Preventive Are Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs? A Critique of School-Based Prevention Models in the United States. Journal of Sex Research (Germany) Vol. 5, Issue 1 (41-55) (March 1992)