Pedosexuality: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) I've seen non symp parties using it |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Pedosexual''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles. | __NOTOC__{{MAI}}'''Pedosexual''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles. | ||
The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage. | The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage. |
Revision as of 16:37, 20 March 2009
Part of NewgonWiki's series on minor-attracted identities | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Starting Guide | Community | Pediverse MAP | NOMAP | AAM | Neologisms "MAP" Origins | Flag | Movement Political history: MAP & LGBT Alliances Philias: Ephebo - Hebe - Pedo - Nepio Gender and attraction: BL - EL - GL Pederasty/Gay BL | Korephilia/Lesbian GL Pro-c | Neutral-c | Anti-c BLogo | GLogo | |||||||
| |||||||
Category: Minor-attracted people | |||||||
Template:MAI - This template |
Pedosexual is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, value-neutral term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be boys or girls. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of homosexual. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the Mattachine Society in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.
The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.
A disadvantage of the proposed term would be that a large portion of Minor-Attracted Persons who are primarily attracted to adolescents would be excluded from the group of people described as pedosexuals. This is the same problem that has caused some opposition to the term "childlover." Boylovers on the Internet for instance, are not a cohesive community in many respects but to a large degree they do not tend to separate themselves into communities of those attracted to prepubescent boys and those attracted to older boys. Coining a term that would magnify the difference between those subgroups could be seen as divisive and might have the potential to actually divide the communities if adopted.
Pedosexual vs. pedophile
The term pedophile has existed for millennia. The recent issues with the term mainly center around its modern connotation. In the 19th century, it was coined into a term for a paraphilia, that is, a clinical mental illness. This has allowed the ideal regarding the preference, and practice, to fall into further and further negative light. With the recent turn into glamorization of severe cases of child abuse, rape, and clear cases of molestation, the term "pedophile" has become a media coin-phrase to regard all type of circumstances, whether or not they truly are pedophiliac in nature, and is felt to have cast permanent damage on the definition and connotation of the word.
Pedosexual vs. childlover/boylover/girllover
There is an ongoing controversy within the boylove/girllove communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two forms of childlove. Some say that non-sexual forms of childlove are indeed possible. Arguments against that often claim that those who are non-sexual childlovers are "closeted" or "in denial".
In essence, for one to label themselves as a "childlover", and what the term means, is purely up to that individual person. It also delves into that person's own sexual make-up. Distinction between the terms "pedosexual" and "childlover" may help to differentiate between the two beliefs commonly held.
Pedosexuality
To be pedosexual does not necessarily mean that one acts upon their desires. It is not a legal definition casting light on the person's activities. Actually participating in sexual relations with minors can lead to criminal prosecution, prison, classification as a sex offender, or in more extreme cases, death.
Possible criticism
If the constituent term "sexuality" is seen as identifying a preference for one gender, both or the other, "pedosexuality" is an inaccurate term as it intends to identify a chronophilia (age-based attraction). Whilst other preferences, notably Zoophilia/Zoosexuality have been described as sexual preferences, this does not necessarily make the usage of this term correct.
Prominent attitudes toward pedosexuality
Public opinions toward child sexuality and pedosexuality differ between societies. Generally speaking, Western cultures apply tighter constraints and heavier penalties than others do. In fact, in some cultures, both present and past, multi-generational sexual relations are not only tolerated, but openly accepted.
Support communities for pedosexuals
"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as NAMBLA and other early attempts at organization and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the online community of childlovers in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.