Gert Hekma: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Prue (talk | contribs)
2,547 edits
No edit summary
Prue (talk | contribs)
2,547 edits
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
In the book reviews section for ''Sexualities'', Hekma wrote on relevant authors including [[Bruce Rind]], historian [https://en.ua1lib.org/book/13428246/825aac Phillip Jenkins], and [[Rudiger Lautmann]]. On the Rind et al. (1998) controversy, Hekma wrote:
In the book reviews section for ''Sexualities'', Hekma wrote on relevant authors including [[Bruce Rind]], historian [https://en.ua1lib.org/book/13428246/825aac Phillip Jenkins], and [[Rudiger Lautmann]]. On the Rind et al. (1998) controversy, Hekma wrote:


"The conclusions are clear. There are victims but for most boys sex with adults does not create damage. Relations with adult women are experienced as a form of sexual initiation. Those with men are more problematic because boys will often start to feel insecure about sexual orientation and gender identity. These problems are not inherent in the relation but [exist] in a social context that abhors unmasculinity and homosexuality." (Book Ends, [https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003003005 Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999, p. 505]).  
<blockquote>''The conclusions are clear. There are victims but for most boys sex with adults does not create damage. Relations with adult women are experienced as a form of sexual initiation. Those with men are more problematic because boys will often start to feel insecure about sexual orientation and gender identity. These problems are not inherent in the relation but [exist] in a social context that abhors unmasculinity and homosexuality.'' (Book Ends, [https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003003005 Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999, p. 505]).</blockquote>
   
   
After Rind et al. was unanimously condemned (but not refuted) bu the United States Congress, Hekma wrote: "''It is incredible that there was not one sane and thinking member of Congress to oppose this resolution.''" (Book Ends, [https://www.gerthekma.nl/ewExternalFiles/Book%20Ends%204.pdf?target=%20blank Volume 3, No. 3, 2000, p. 368]).
After Rind et al. was unanimously condemned (but not refuted) bu the United States Congress, Hekma wrote: "''It is incredible that there was not one sane and thinking member of Congress to oppose this resolution.''" (Book Ends, [https://www.gerthekma.nl/ewExternalFiles/Book%20Ends%204.pdf?target=%20blank Volume 3, No. 3, 2000, p. 368]).


Hekma wrote an obituary for [[Frits Bernard]] (died May 2006), a Dutch psychologist, sexologist, homosexual activist, and key figure of the 1st wave of the [[MAP Movement]], in ''Sexualities'' (2007, below). In an interview with Martijn for OK Magazine (2004)<ref>https://www.brongersma.info/Interview_with_Gert_Hekma_(Gay-_%26_Lesbian_Teacher)</ref>, Hekma recalls that he had erotic dreams about Santa Claus at 6 years of age, and said of his childhood:
Hekma wrote an obituary for [[Frits Bernard]] (died May 2006), a Dutch psychologist, sexologist, homosexual activist, and key figure of the 1st wave of the [[MAP Movement]], in ''Sexualities'' (2007, below). In an interview with Martijn for ''OK Magazine'' (2004)<ref>https://www.brongersma.info/Interview_with_Gert_Hekma_(Gay-_%26_Lesbian_Teacher)</ref>, Hekma recalls that he had erotic dreams about Santa Claus at 6 years of age, and said of his childhood:


"I was a happy child, that is beyond dispute. But, of course, it was a life without sex though. I masturbated many, many times and extensively and played with friends in the attic. It was erotic, but not sexual. It was a repressive milieu, so in that sense I do not look back at it that positively. I think that when you look at boys and yearn for them and that you don't know that you are gay or what it is; that is terrible."
<blockquote>''I was a happy child, that is beyond dispute. But, of course, it was a life without sex though. I masturbated many, many times and extensively and played with friends in the attic. It was erotic, but not sexual. It was a repressive milieu, so in that sense I do not look back at it that positively. I think that when you look at boys and yearn for them and that you don't know that you are gay or what it is; that is terrible.''</blockquote>


In the same interview, his comments about the Maquis de Sade, his interpretation that Sade's philosophy demonstrates that pressure can be a benevolent force in sexual relations - would attract much controversy. He said:
In the same interview, his comments about the Maquis de Sade, his interpretation that Sade's philosophy demonstrates that pressure can be a benevolent force in sexual relations - would attract much controversy. He said:


"Sade gives you the impression that actually people need to be forced to enjoy sexual pleasure. De Sade's small book ''Philosophie dans le boudoir'' (1795) [...] is a lesbian novel [...] about a woman who has fallen in love with a girl. This woman invites this girl to her and she is then given lessons in love by a number of gentlemen and by the woman herself. And within one day she knows then that this entire Catholic faith which she adhered to so much, and which especially her mother adhered to; that it is talking total nonsense. And that you should do everything exactly the other way around than what the Catholic faith has taught you. And this sexual initiation happens under a certain pressure, by both the Catholics and Sade. There is the idea that if it is about sex, no pressure may happen. That is the big problem with pedophilia, because this involves unequal balances of power, and [[[Accounts_and_Testimonies|inaccurately]]; stereo-typically - Newgon] these men, they force boys to sex they do not want. As for Sade it is like[,] you need to be forced a bit to learn what you like. We accept this in many, many areas. You are forced to go to school. You are forced as a child to eat your food. You are forced to crap and pee neatly at certain times. The child is being forced endlessly, but as for sex it suddenly is not allowed anymore. Sade indicates: exactly with a little pressure you learn how nice sex is."
<blockquote>''Sade gives you the impression that actually people need to be forced to enjoy sexual pleasure. De Sade's small book ''Philosophie dans le boudoir'' (1795) [...] is a lesbian novel [...] about a woman who has fallen in love with a girl. This woman invites this girl to her and she is then given lessons in love by a number of gentlemen and by the woman herself. And within one day she knows then that this entire Catholic faith which she adhered to so much, and which especially her mother adhered to; that it is talking total nonsense. And that you should do everything exactly the other way around than what the Catholic faith has taught you. And this sexual initiation happens under a certain pressure, by both the Catholics and Sade. There is the idea that if it is about sex, no pressure may happen. That is the big problem with pedophilia, because this involves unequal balances of power, and [[[Accounts_and_Testimonies|inaccurately]]; stereo-typically - Newgon] these men, they force boys to sex they do not want. As for Sade it is like[,] you need to be forced a bit to learn what you like. We accept this in many, many areas. You are forced to go to school. You are forced as a child to eat your food. You are forced to crap and pee neatly at certain times. The child is being forced endlessly, but as for sex it suddenly is not allowed anymore. Sade indicates: exactly with a little pressure you learn how nice sex is.''</blockquote>


In 2007, Hekma received media coverage and death threats after supporting the idea proposed by a group of adolescents, to include a canal boat for gay youth at the Amsterdam Gay Pride.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20200807015936/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Scandal_2007</ref> In 2014, Hekma co-created a petition addressed to the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, requesting that the Dutch Supreme Court not ban MAP association [[Vereniging MARTIJN]]. His support of MARTIJN resulted in death threats and an attempted burglary. Hekma was not a pedophile, and was in a lifelong adult-adult partnership sociologist Mattias Duyves (1953), who were together for more than forty years. Duyves had been a sexual partner of [[Michel Foucault]], with Hekma meeting Duyves in 1977 and marrying in 2007.
In 2007, Hekma received media coverage and death threats after supporting the idea proposed by a group of adolescents, to include a canal boat for gay youth at the Amsterdam Gay Pride.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20200807015936/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Scandal_2007</ref> In 2014, Hekma co-created a petition addressed to the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, requesting that the Dutch Supreme Court not ban MAP association [[Vereniging MARTIJN]]. His support of MARTIJN resulted in death threats and an attempted burglary. Hekma was not a pedophile, and was in a lifelong adult-adult partnership sociologist Mattias Duyves (1953), who were together for more than forty years. Duyves had been a sexual partner of [[Michel Foucault]], with Hekma meeting Duyves in 1977 and marrying in 2007.

Revision as of 05:45, 12 March 2023

Gert Hekma

Gert Hekma (24 September 1951 – 19 April 2022) was a Dutch anthropologist and sociologist, known for his research, publications, and public statements about (homo)sexuality, including pedophilia and sadomasochism. He taught gay and lesbian studies at the University of Amsterdam from 1984 to 2017. Hekma became fascinated with the Marquis de Sade, Hekma has served as editor or editorial board member of many periodicals, including Sexualities (1998-death), founded by Ken Plummer, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia (1988-1997), GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies (1993-2005) , and Journal of Homosexuality (1985-death), ran until recently by the MAP allied psychologist John de Cecco.

In youth, Hekma was a member of the radical "Red Faggots" (Dutch: "Rooie Flikkers"). Hekma was a prolific book collector, and had a fetish for satin. Hekma advocated against masculinity, paternalism, traditional gender roles, and for a return to sexual practice over sexual identity.

Hekma and MAP politics

In the book reviews section for Sexualities, Hekma wrote on relevant authors including Bruce Rind, historian Phillip Jenkins, and Rudiger Lautmann. On the Rind et al. (1998) controversy, Hekma wrote:

The conclusions are clear. There are victims but for most boys sex with adults does not create damage. Relations with adult women are experienced as a form of sexual initiation. Those with men are more problematic because boys will often start to feel insecure about sexual orientation and gender identity. These problems are not inherent in the relation but [exist] in a social context that abhors unmasculinity and homosexuality. (Book Ends, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999, p. 505).

After Rind et al. was unanimously condemned (but not refuted) bu the United States Congress, Hekma wrote: "It is incredible that there was not one sane and thinking member of Congress to oppose this resolution." (Book Ends, Volume 3, No. 3, 2000, p. 368).

Hekma wrote an obituary for Frits Bernard (died May 2006), a Dutch psychologist, sexologist, homosexual activist, and key figure of the 1st wave of the MAP Movement, in Sexualities (2007, below). In an interview with Martijn for OK Magazine (2004)[1], Hekma recalls that he had erotic dreams about Santa Claus at 6 years of age, and said of his childhood:

I was a happy child, that is beyond dispute. But, of course, it was a life without sex though. I masturbated many, many times and extensively and played with friends in the attic. It was erotic, but not sexual. It was a repressive milieu, so in that sense I do not look back at it that positively. I think that when you look at boys and yearn for them and that you don't know that you are gay or what it is; that is terrible.

In the same interview, his comments about the Maquis de Sade, his interpretation that Sade's philosophy demonstrates that pressure can be a benevolent force in sexual relations - would attract much controversy. He said:

Sade gives you the impression that actually people need to be forced to enjoy sexual pleasure. De Sade's small book Philosophie dans le boudoir (1795) [...] is a lesbian novel [...] about a woman who has fallen in love with a girl. This woman invites this girl to her and she is then given lessons in love by a number of gentlemen and by the woman herself. And within one day she knows then that this entire Catholic faith which she adhered to so much, and which especially her mother adhered to; that it is talking total nonsense. And that you should do everything exactly the other way around than what the Catholic faith has taught you. And this sexual initiation happens under a certain pressure, by both the Catholics and Sade. There is the idea that if it is about sex, no pressure may happen. That is the big problem with pedophilia, because this involves unequal balances of power, and [[[Accounts_and_Testimonies|inaccurately]]; stereo-typically - Newgon] these men, they force boys to sex they do not want. As for Sade it is like[,] you need to be forced a bit to learn what you like. We accept this in many, many areas. You are forced to go to school. You are forced as a child to eat your food. You are forced to crap and pee neatly at certain times. The child is being forced endlessly, but as for sex it suddenly is not allowed anymore. Sade indicates: exactly with a little pressure you learn how nice sex is.

In 2007, Hekma received media coverage and death threats after supporting the idea proposed by a group of adolescents, to include a canal boat for gay youth at the Amsterdam Gay Pride.[2] In 2014, Hekma co-created a petition addressed to the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, requesting that the Dutch Supreme Court not ban MAP association Vereniging MARTIJN. His support of MARTIJN resulted in death threats and an attempted burglary. Hekma was not a pedophile, and was in a lifelong adult-adult partnership sociologist Mattias Duyves (1953), who were together for more than forty years. Duyves had been a sexual partner of Michel Foucault, with Hekma meeting Duyves in 1977 and marrying in 2007.

As a historian specializing in male homosexuality, Hekma was aware that pederasty was the dominant form of male same-sex practice until the post-war (1945-) period. His writings, such as "Wrong Lovers" (1987 below),

In a 2013 book chapter "Same Sex, Different Ages: On Pederasty in Gay History", co-authored with Donald Mader, Hekma argued that pederasty comprised the vast majority of recorded history of homosexuality.

In a 2014 conference paper available to watch on youtube (external link here), later published as "Kinderen, seks en zelfbepaling" [En: Children, sex and self-determination] - read in his absence by Thomas Hubbard - Hekma gave a historical overview of Dutch movements around pedophilia and pederasty. He proposes explanations for "the surprising demonization of pedophilia":

Selected Publications

References

  1. ↑ https://www.brongersma.info/Interview_with_Gert_Hekma_(Gay-_%26_Lesbian_Teacher)
  2. ↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20200807015936/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Scandal_2007
Retrieved from "https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Gert_Hekma&oldid=18516"