23 Sep, 2024: Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior against MAPs, on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group, is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of disinformation by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.
Template:EGLConsent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | ||
File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | ||
File:Fouca.png|Foucault, 1978 | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 24 April 2023
-
Bruce Rind on CSA concept (in)validity -
Rind on lack of predictive validity for informed consent/CSA concept invalidity -
Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued -
David Finkelhor (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument -
Robert Ehman on the failed circular "consent" argument -
Robert Ehman on the real reasons for consent vs no consent binarism -
Terry Leahy: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex -
Paul Okami on Power Imbalance argument (from Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)) -
Review of Sandfort and consent -
Scott De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors -
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors: Consent dogma -
Foucault, 1978
