Big 3 (Paraphilia): Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
One major problematic of the ''"Big 3"'' concept is | One major problematic of the ''"Big 3"'' concept is that it prioritizes the presumed social [[Validity Policing|invalidity]] of sexual desires as operative in their classification as paraphilic. At the same time, the use of "big" is ambiguous, since this would appear to hint at commonality. For example, sadism, perhaps the most common "paraphilia", along with [[Wikipedia:Paraphilic infantilism|infantilism]], is excluded from the concept. This has been criticized as [[Wiktionary:reification|reifying]] social norms, encouraging the ghettoization of deviant communities from "more acceptable" paraphiles, and their conflation with "less acceptable" paraphiles in the public eye. | ||
Another criticism has been that some individuals (e.g. Zoos, [[Boylove]]rs, MAPs) who fall under the purview of the ''"Big 3"'' | Another criticism has been that some individuals (e.g. Zoos, [[Boylove]]rs, MAPs) who fall under the purview of the ''"Big 3"'' do not see themselves as paraphilic. They instead see themselves as experiencing ''patterns of attraction'' to other individuals, i.e. to be sexually inclined/oriented and not experiencing kinks or fetishes in this regard. Kinks, fetishes, paraphilias might exist, according to these critics, but ''in parallel'' with orientations or patterns of attraction.<ref>[https://www.boychat.org/messages/1635765.htm Criticism], [https://www.boychat.org/messages/1635775.htm 2] via [[BoyChat]]</ref> | ||
The term has been described on [[pediverse]] as having aspects of [[Wikipedia:Edgelord|edgelording]] about it, in that it needlessly sensationalizes a person's subjective world | The term has been described on [[pediverse]] as having aspects of [[Wikipedia:Edgelord|edgelording]] about it, in that it needlessly sensationalizes a person's subjective world while attempting to elaborate it, while putting others in the same basket against their will. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Latest revision as of 23:09, 30 December 2024
The "Big 3/Big Three" refers to the controversial and extremely online concept of pedophilia (or even MAP identity in general) as encompassing one part of a triad of highly-divergent "paraphilias", made complete by Zoophilia and Necrophilia. It is most often referred to within pediverse servers, erotic fiction fandoms, and online communities of marginalized people, e.g. paratwt (paraphilic communities on X.com).
Criticism
One major problematic of the "Big 3" concept is that it prioritizes the presumed social invalidity of sexual desires as operative in their classification as paraphilic. At the same time, the use of "big" is ambiguous, since this would appear to hint at commonality. For example, sadism, perhaps the most common "paraphilia", along with infantilism, is excluded from the concept. This has been criticized as reifying social norms, encouraging the ghettoization of deviant communities from "more acceptable" paraphiles, and their conflation with "less acceptable" paraphiles in the public eye.
Another criticism has been that some individuals (e.g. Zoos, Boylovers, MAPs) who fall under the purview of the "Big 3" do not see themselves as paraphilic. They instead see themselves as experiencing patterns of attraction to other individuals, i.e. to be sexually inclined/oriented and not experiencing kinks or fetishes in this regard. Kinks, fetishes, paraphilias might exist, according to these critics, but in parallel with orientations or patterns of attraction.[2]
The term has been described on pediverse as having aspects of edgelording about it, in that it needlessly sensationalizes a person's subjective world while attempting to elaborate it, while putting others in the same basket against their will.