Helmut Kentler

Helmut Kentler

Part of NewgonWiki's series on Academia
Research topics   NewgonWiki Research Project Academics (present)   Angelides, Graupner, Tromovitch, Walker Andersson, Butler, Breslow, Rubin Kershnar, Singer, Rind, Janssen, Smith Hubbard, Horii, Herdt, Edelman, Loftus Cleves, Syrett, Arce Vidal, Thompson Žižek, Sandfort, McCartan, White Sinason, Abel, Malesky, Finkelhor Academics (inactive)   Leahy, Dowsett, Sikes, Califia, Gieles Yuill, Kincaid, Paglia, Williams, Langfeldt Bleibtreu-Ehrenberg, Schultz, Kennedy Sax, Farrell, Best, Jenkins, Ullerstam C. K. Li, Okami, Kilpatrick, Dannecker Lautmann, Durber, Schmidt De Young, Dallam, Jackson Academics (historical)   Reich, Foucault, Kinsey, Percy Sonenschein, Faust, Foster, Mader Hekma, Martinson, Bullough, Bernard Johansson, Hocquenghem, De Cecco Schérer, Kentler, Sigusch, Baurmann Burton, Rutschky, Hertoft, Schorsch Brongersma, Ogrinc, Plummer, Weeks Money, Duvert, Ingram, Green, Mirkin Simon, Gagnon, West, Reeves, Shively Holt, Tripp Densen-Gerber, Reisman, Whitfield, Fink Related topics   Queer Theory, Feminism, Consent Minor-adult sex, CSA, Paraphilia Sexceptionalism, Sexualization Heteronormativity, Trans youth Hebephilia, Pedophilia, Teleiophilia Censorship, Chris Brand, Moral panic Preventionism, Minor Attracted Person Masturbation, Inner child, CSBI IICSA, CSAM, Covert incest Pedophilia OCD, Teen Dating Violence Repressed memory, Anal wink Kent State Study, Rind et al, CSAAS COPINE Scale, Cognitive distortion Adolescence, Abel screening Actuarial testing, Plethysmography Erwin Schrodinger, Carleton Gajdusek David Riegel, Jordan Peterson Wikipedia, Rites of passage Medicalism, Evolving capacity Nocebogenic harm, Moral Recruitment Intrinsic harm Orgs and Publications   JoH, ASB, Paidika, JCI, FSRS B4U-ACT, PF, Ipce, AASECT NARTH, TLC OJP, NSPCC, ASPAC
Template: Ac - This template

Helmut Kentler (2 July 1928 in Cologne – 9 July 2008 in Hannover) was a German Psychologist, sex education expert, court-appointed specialist and professor of social education at the University of Hannover. Kentler pursued an Emancipationist Philosophy with regards to youth, but among his greatest and most contentious achievements was his work with the disadvantaged, particularly delinquent male youth and their carers. From 1979 to 1982 he was president of the German Society for Social-Scientific Sexual Research, later he was on the advisory board of the Humanistische Union. He was also a member of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sexualforschung.

Kentler was for a period, a high-profile courtroom expert in the "Squealer Assassin" mold of American defense experts Ralph Underwager and Elizabeth Loftus. Indeed, in 1999, he had planned an (as yet) unpublished book on this topic, in which he details 35 cases in which he believed strongly that the accused were innocent.

Since his death, Kentler's work has been defamed in a campaign of posthumous and political/opportunistic systemic legacy harassment. A number of highly sensational media hit pieces, laden with emotionalism and capitalized upon by right wing (AfD) political interests have ensued. Two men have since testified against Kentler after receiving legal aid from the party, and were handsomely compensated by the State of Berlin as a result.

Emancipatory ideology

For Helmut Kentler, theory and practice were tightly knit throughout his life. He developed a theory of emancipatory youth work via his work with adolescents and young adults as a student, and the five years he spent working in church educational institutions. He implemented group pedagogy and team work, as trusting and respectful cooperation between educators with different professional competence, and attempted to gain insight into the psychological and social connection between learning and emancipation. During the student riots in Berlin, Kentler was temporarily active as a "psychological consultant for police issues". The sexual liberation movement of Berlin students in communities and shared flats, resulted in his advocacy of an emancipatory sexual education in the home,. Advocating for sex education to be taught in the home was not uncommon in the 1970s, and this ideological trend was reflected in his dissertation in 1975, which earned him credence as an expert in sex education for the rest of his professional life. Kentler also occasionally makes reference to influential sexual liberation theorists of the time, such as Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse.

View of pederasty

[...] I have [...] in the vast majority of cases made the experience that pederastic conditions can have a very positive effect on the personality development of a boy, especially if the pederast is a real mentor of the boy. (Helmut Kentler, 1999)

In 1981, Kentler was invited to the German parliament to speak about why homosexuality should be decriminalized—it didn’t happen for thirteen more years—but he strayed, unprompted, into a discussion of his experiment. “We looked after and advised these relationships very intensively,” he said. He held consultations with the foster fathers and their sons, many of whom had been so neglected that they had never learned to read or write. “These people only put up with these feeble-minded boys because they were in love with them,” he told the lawmakers. (from the New Yorker)

Cover of Helmut Kentler’s Book Eltern Lernen Sexual-Erziehung (Parents Learn Sexual-Education), depicting parents bathing naked with their young children. Image credit: Amazon.com

Intergenerational sex

In Kentler's view, it was not enough for parents to avoid putting obstacles in the way of their children's sexual desires; rather, parents should introduce their children to sexuality, because otherwise they "risk leaving them sexually underdeveloped, becoming sexual cripples". Early experiences of coitus are useful, because teenagers with coitus experience "demand an independent world of teenagers and more often reject the norms of adults". Kentler warned the parents against being concerned over rape or molestation of children by adults: "The wrong thing to do now would be for parents to lose their nerve, panic and run straight to the police. If the adult had been considerate and tender, the child could even have enjoyed sexual contact with him". "If such relationships are not discriminated against by the environment, then the more the older one feels responsible for the younger one, the more positive consequences for personality development can be expected", he wrote in 1974 in his foreword to the controversial sex education book, Zeig mal! (En: "Show Me!", documented in full at BoyWiki.)

Some sources such as the New Yorker claim that Kentler disowned his views on intergenerational sex in the early 90s following the suicide of an adoptive son he was said to have claimed was abused by his birth mother. It was unclear to what extent this would have been political (at the time, moral panic was at its highest in Germany), but his 1999 opinion on pederasty above appears to conflict with this, as does Rudiger Lautmann's obituary. The worst of the harassment against his legacy took place long after his withdrawal from the debate on intergenerational sexuality, and death.

Famous study

At the end of the 1960s, in a model experiment, he placed several delinquent 13 to 15-year-old boys, whom he considered "secondary mental defectives", with pederasts he knew - in order to contribute towards their socialization as productive adults. These studies (whose scale is unknown) were conducted in Berlin with the support of the Youth Welfare Office. Kentler did not hide the fact that he placed young people with pederasts he knew. He reported about it in his book Leihväter from 1989. He also maintained contacts with the former participants during his teaching activities in Hanover and, in an expert opinion for the Berlin Family Court in the early 1990s, recommended that one of the youths continue to stay with his pederastic foster father, whom he described as a pedagogical natural talent.

Data and findings

Call for input! This article has only limited information on a subject which should be covered in greater detail. If you have information to contribute, please consider getting involved or contacting us.

Kentler claims the results of his study to have been a "complete success" Despite this, little is known about the precise data and findings of Kentler's work. This could be due to a lack of translation, possible state involvement in a cover-up, and/or loss of key documents. As to the sample size, Teresa Nentwig, a state-appointed social scientist discussed later on in this article stated “we don’t know”, explaining that city archivists blocked access to crucial data. According to her investigation, “the Senate also ran foster homes or shared flats for young Berliners with pedophile men in other parts of West Germany.” Dr. Nentwig published a huge 752 page book on Kentler which hasn't been translated to English. By contrast, her 2019 report "Helmut Kentler and the University of Hannover," is publicly available for download. Nentwig argues that positive views of age-gap sexual contact were not exceptional in both the era and Left wing, progressive, radical space Kentler occupied. She writes (translated) that:

[Karin] Désirat – just like Klaus Pacharzina – held similar views to Kentler on removing the taboo and decriminalizing sexual contact between adults and children. Karin Désirat interprets the two anthologies she co-edited, which contain several paedophile-friendly texts, as follows: “[...] it was also the social development on an intellectual level that finally allowed the topic of sexuality to be discussed in general. Previously, it was only discussed in quiet whispers. [...] At the time, it was considered revolutionary that pedophilia was being discussed openly and, in some cases, even positively.” Against this background, it can be assumed that Désirat and Pacharzina were at least not opposed to Kentler’s “experiment.” (Ibid, p. 115).

Nentwig also wrote: "[N]o one heard of Kentler's report at the time, or if someone did know about it, they did not see it as a problem." (p. 114).

A woman who worked with Kentler recalls:

When asked about the placement of young prostitutes [...] in foster homes with pedophiles or pederastic men, Kirsten Lehmkuhl said that she herself came from the psychoanalytically oriented residential care scene. When she applied for a job with Helmut Kentler in the early 1990s and was invited to an interview, she read Kentler's book “Surrogate Fathers. Children Need Fathers” in preparation. Lehmkuhl still remembers well how she reacted to the relevant passages in Kentler's report on the placement of young prostitutes with men who had contact with the prostitute scene: This did not seem unproblematic to her, but she recognized that here someone had actually looked at the young people as people, at their desire for closeness and security, after the boys concerned had previously experienced terrible things – in their families, in homes, at Bahnhof Zoo. Kentler made them an offer of bonding and arranged it. The boys could continue to live largely independently and, for example, did not have to submit to the regulations of residential care; At the same time, however, the young people’s longing for someone who liked them was fulfilled through the foster relationship. In this way, Kentler probably wanted to give them "a little bit of empowerment in a terrible situation." (p. 116).

Harassment

After the magazine Emma had reported on his activities in 1993, Kentler was shouted down by feminist activists at an event in Hannover, receiving a punch in the face from an attendee. Due to the journalistic work by Ursula Enders, he was prevented from receiving the Magnus Hirschfeld Prize in 1997 "at the last minute".

Kentler's study was again publicly debated in 2015, when the Senate Youth Administration commissioned the political scientist Teresa Nentwig from the University of Göttingen to investigate it and forward her findings to the relevant authorities. Predictably, the Berlin Senator for Education Sandra Scheeres called the "experiment" at that time a "crime in state responsibility". In 2017/18, Nentwig was further commissioned in Lower Saxony to research the "effects" of Kentler's activities. Nentwig did not dismiss the possibility that Kentler himself was involved in the "abuse", despite there being no evidence or accusers. Hannover University then disowned any credit to Kentler's research after a series of politically-motivated investigations. At this point, a representative of the far-right AfD party contacted one of the participants in the study and a lawsuit against the State of Berlin was drawn up involving two former boys. According to the New Yorker, for around two years, the AfD made political capital out of this at their events. On 15 June 2020, a report prepared by social scientists entitled "Helmut Kentler's Work in Berlin Child and Youth Services" was presented in Berlin. The Berlin Senator for Education Sandra Scheeres promised those effected by the "abuse" financial compensation by the State of Berlin. The men accepted this compensation.

Praise

• University staff who worked under Kentler:

- Martin Kipp "stressed that Kentler had "a productive relationship with mistakes" from which students and staff benefited, and that he "constantly stimulated and encouraged his staff, but never put them down." - "Peter Eckardt also stressed that Kentler was never an authoritarian superior" - "Karin Désirat repeatedly stressed the support she had received from Kentler. [...H]e had also got her her first job at the chair [...] She also owes her membership in the DGfS and the Society for the Promotion of Social Scientific Sexual Research (GFSS) to Kentler: he brought her into contact with both sexological organizations. As early as 1978, Désirat – the second woman since the founding of the DGfS in 1950 – even became a member of its board, alongside the well-known sex researchers Volkmar Sigusch, Eberhard Schorsch, Martin Dannecker".

• Jan Feddersen praised Kentler in an obituary in the Tageszeitung of 12 July 2008, as a "meritorious fighter for a permissive sexual morality"
• "Friedrich Johannsen, Dean of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Hanover from 2005 to 2009, emphasized in his memorial speech after Kentler's death: "His concept of youth work aimed at the autonomy of people and a better society."
• Some protestant church authorities expressed a similar opinion. In an obituary, the Study Centre for Protestant Youth Work pointed out Kentler's controversial positions, but also acknowledged his work for "institutional structure and professional socialisation" and the attempts to make homosexuality socially acceptable in the church.
• The Humanist Union pays positive tribute to Kentler's person and body of work. In his obituary it says: "A lighthouse of our advisory board has gone out. Like no other, Helmut Kentler embodied the humanistic task of an enlightened sex education, and he was also a role model for public science. (...) His habitus combined the qualities of competence, authenticity and closeness in a rare way, with which Kentler impressed his readers and listeners alike ... Since he immediately aroused sympathies, many have confided in him."

See also

• Rudiger Lautmann
• Volkmar Sigusch

External links

• American Conservative - Full New Yorker article currently behind paywall, but copied here and archive.
• Wikipedia